[digiKam-users] Tags management

[ron.orenstein at rogers.com]

I find the tree structure useful, if only to avoid having an extremely long list of tags to scroll through (much of my tag structure is for wildlife and use a heirarchical scientific classification (eg animals>insects>lepidoptera>nymphalidae>nymphalinae). Usually I manually tag the photo with all of these levels, combined with other tags for locality. It depends on your preference, of course, but if all these tags are applied they will all appear in an export, if not in tree order.

Ronald Orenstein 1825 Shady Creek Court Mississauga, ON L5L 3W2 Canada ronorenstein.blogspot.com
On Jul 24, 2020, 10:24 AM -0400, jdd at dodin.org <jdd at dodin.org>, wrote:
> Le 24/07/2020 à 14:28, Cesar Inacio Martins a écrit :
>
> > 2) I'm reorganizing into a tree structure, merging someones, moving others.
>
> I never do this. more precisely, I use a flat tag structure with names
> and subnames (Toulouse, Toulouse-Capitole, Toulouse-Capitole-facade...)
>
> mostly because tree view is not portable, for example, I don't think web
> galleries do support it
>
> jdd
>
>
> --
> http://dodin.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20200724/0f96298f/attachment.htm>