[digiKam-users] Database backward compatibility? 6.4.0-9

[Gilles Caulier]

https://files.kde.org/digikam/ is to deploy a beta version of bundles
including AppImage with and without debug symbols. It's for testing
only, not for production uses.

But you are not curious ? take a look in README file for details...

Note : 7.0.0 pre version which can be found in this shared directory
include more than 650 bug fix compared to last stable 6.4.0 :

https://bugs.kde.org/buglist.cgi?f1=cf_versionfixedin&limit=0&list_id=1737310&o1=equals&order=bug_id&product=digikam&v1=7.0.0

Gilles Caulier

Le mar. 21 avr. 2020 à 16:11, Johannes Graumann
<digikam-ng.jg at graumannschaft.org> a écrit :
>
> I found the appimage, which might be an alternative (earlier search for flatpak did not produce a result) - is there a source for an app image? I have the impression that what's found at https://files.kde.org/digikam/ is to cutting edge for me ...
>
> Sincerely, Joh
>
> On 2020-04-21 08:19, Johannes Graumann wrote:
>
> I'm moving my setup to QubesOS and they do not offer a template OS
> image that offers a newer version of digikam. I could overcome this by
> using a flatpak, but digikam does not seem to distribute that way ...
>
> But the bottom line is: it should be possible.
>
> Sincerely, Joh
>
> On Mon, 2020-04-20 at 22:01 +0100, digikam-users-request at kde.org wrote:
>
> Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 22:54:40 +0200
>
> From: Maik Qualmann <metzpinguin at gmail.com>
>
> To: digiKam - Home Manage your photographs as a professional with the
>
>         power of open source <digikam-users at kde.org>
>
> Subject: Re: [digiKam-users] Database backward compatibility? 6.4.0-9
>
>         --> 6.0.0-5
>
> Message-ID: <2759958.C4g2VmnSn1 at linux-tpgn>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>
>
> Not a good idea. The core database schema has not changed between
> 6.0.0 and
>
> 6.4.0. But there are a lot of bugs fixed between these versions.
>
>
>
> Maik
>
>
>
> Am Montag, 20. April 2020, 22:46:05 CEST schrieb Johannes Graumann:
>
> Hi,
> I'm in the process of moving my archive setup from archlinux
> (currently
> using digikam 6.4.0-9) to fedora-30 (@ digikam 6.0.0-5).
> Could that work with respect to databse structure and data
> retention?
> Thank you for any insight.
> Sincerely, Joh
>
>