[digiKam-users] Fwd: Using the Image Quality Sorter
James Orr
jorr1948 at earthlink.net
Mon Jun 10 22:35:27 BST 2019
Well, it seems I was too much in a hurry, and that I misunderstood
something in the Tools|Maintenance dialogue box.
I thought when I was in the Process items from: part of the page, I
could select one folder and have DK act only on it (and maybe its children).
I thought this because I had cleared the box for whole albums collection.
I just started to browse my collection and it appears that almost all of
the images in my Pictures folder have been examined. Although I have not
inventoried each folder, I did find 3-4 where the CR2 files had not been
marked, though the images in the child folders had been marked.
This does seem odd.
Is this worth Bugzilla?
James M. Orr 2705 E Sussex Way Fresno, CA 93726
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Using the Image Quality Sorter
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 13:40:47 -0700
From: James Orr <jorr1948 at earthlink.net>
Reply-To: jorr1948 at earthlink.net
To: digikam-users-group--kde.org <digikam-users at kde.org>
It seems odd to me that the image quality marking feature is located
under Maintenance--seems odd to me. Anyway ...
I wanted to be sure that I understand this feature, so I went to the
Tools|Maintenance window and cleared all the selections except for using
multiple cores and using the Image Quality Sorter (skip images already
scanned). Then I selected one folder with 99 Canon CR2 raw images, and
two subfolders with TIF images: one with 33 HDR images and the other
with 2 edited images.
I left all of the default options checked under settings.
It took hours and several restarts to get through all the images.
None of the Canon RAW images were marked in any way. The others were.
Is this tool designed to skip Canon RAW images?
Is this the level of performance I should expect when using the Image
Quality Sorter?
--
James M. Orr 2705 E Sussex Way Fresno, CA 93726
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20190610/ee01d827/attachment.html>
More information about the Digikam-users
mailing list