[digiKam-users] LinkedIn user group...
Stefan Müller
stefan.mueller.83 at gmail.com
Sun Jan 27 20:06:51 GMT 2019
so LinkeIn or pixl.us?
Am 24.01.2019 um 19:10 schrieb Pat David:
> It's enabled. I had written a great response to Andrew, but it's
> caught up in the moderation queue because I attached a couple of
> screenshot images. :(
>
> Long story short, you can use the entire forum as a mailing list if
> you want (even just specific categories only). The only thing we
> haven't turned on yet is starting new topics by email, but we're
> probably going to soon.
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 12:08 PM Leo Gaspard
> <digikam-users at leo.gaspard.io <mailto:digikam-users at leo.gaspard.io>>
> wrote:
>
> I haven't checked this one in particular, but in Discourse in general
> there is an option in the preferences to turn on mailing list
> mode. Unless it's been disabled by the admins, I don't know.
>
> Andrew Goodbody <ajg02 at elfringham.co.uk
> <mailto:ajg02 at elfringham.co.uk>> writes:
>
> > OK, I have just been playing about with https://discuss.pixls.us/
> > My problem with it is mainly that it seems to be just a forum. I
> can
> > find no way to subscribe to a category in order to get emails
> for new
> > topics. This makes it a pull only website. That is too much
> trouble for
> > me. I need push so that things I want to know about get sent to
> me and
> > land in my email inbox. I have better things to do than visit a
> bunch of
> > websites, click refresh on each and try to work out what has
> changed.
> >
> > Or am I missing something?
> >
> > Otherwise it all looks good. There is useful stuff on there.
> >
> > Andrew
> >
> > On 24/01/2019 08:02, Mica Semrick wrote:
> >> We'd love to have all you wonderful people on pixls.us
> <http://pixls.us>! I'd like to
> >> think we are a less creepy platform than LinkedIn as well. We
> have the
> >> social login feature and a bunch of good people!
> >>
> >> - mica
> >>
> >> On January 23, 2019 11:34:10 PM PST, Stefan Mueller
> >> <stefan.mueller.83 at gmail.com
> <mailto:stefan.mueller.83 at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >> @Gilles Caulier <mailto:caulier.gilles at gmail.com
> <mailto:caulier.gilles at gmail.com>> what do you think
> >> about pixel.us <http://pixel.us> <http://pixel.us>
> >> @Simon Frei, writing is a bit more comfortable in the app
> but the
> >> main point is, that you have all your discourse in on app,
> easily
> >> accessible and notification pop up only there if you want
> (as I want)
> >>
> >> Le mer. 23 janv. 2019 à 09:34, Simon Frei
> <freisim93 at gmail.com <mailto:freisim93 at gmail.com>
> >> <mailto:freisim93 at gmail.com <mailto:freisim93 at gmail.com>>>
> a écrit :
> >>
> >> According to reviews this app is just a webview of
> discourse. Which
> >> isn't bad, but you can just as well open it in your
> favorite mobile
> >> browser (which works pretty well, apart from the terrible
> >> typing, which
> >> is unrelated :) ).
> >>
> >> On 23/01/2019 09:27, Stefan Müller wrote:
> >> > it looks like pixel.us <http://pixel.us>
> <http://pixel.us> runs a
> >> https://www.discourse.org/ instance,
> >> > that's great :), the only thing what is missing is
> the mobile
> >> API to
> >> > access it with
> >> >
> https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.discourse.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On 23.01.2019 09:11, Remco Viëtor wrote:
> >> >> On mercredi 23 janvier 2019 08:13:30 CET Stephane
> Ascoet wrote:
> >> >>>> I asked the German Wikipedia for LinkedIn,
> especially the
> >> criticism.
> >> >>>> LinkedIn sends unsolicited invitation emails to
> >> non-members, if not
> >> >>>> responding, re- prompts. I have already received 2
> >> invitations from
> >> >>>> you,
> >> >>>> which you probably did not even initiate. ((:-))
> It is
> >> interesting,
> >> >>>> to an
> >> >>>> e-mail address, which I used perhaps 1 or 2 times
> >> provided. LinkedIn
> >> >>>> probably read your e-mail history. I think there
> are no
> >> serious social
> >> >>>> networks in this world.
> >> >>> Hi, I fully agree. When I was on LinkedIn, I saw in my
> >> "proposed
> >> >>> contacts" at least one people I didn't want to see(for
> >> personnal and
> >> >>> complicated reasons I won't reveal here). The only
> way to
> >> make the link
> >> >>> was to read her address book(or worse). I write
> "worse"
> >> because, yes, I
> >> >>> couldn't think they could do such a thing than reading
> >> mail, but I read
> >> >>> or heard something about this. I though it was on
> this list
> >> but after
> >> >>> verification, it seems not. It was about an attorney
> >> service. They
> >> >>> don't
> >> >>> have the right to talk to the opposite side, or it
> could
> >> create very
> >> >>> bigs problems. However, the opposite side received an
> >> invitation to
> >> >>> join
> >> >>> this attorney's network. It created huge problems,
> they had
> >> much
> >> >>> work to
> >> >>> calm the hurricane it made in the justice
> institutions. The
> >> only way to
> >> >>> make the link between both of them was to read
> mails where
> >> opposite
> >> >>> side's adress was written in the attorney box.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I closed my account(after having send a mail to my
> contacts
> >> that
> >> >>> probably did have no effect) when I realized that
> this site
> >> with a
> >> >>> professional layer were in fact just like the
> other ones
> >> and I don't
> >> >>> understand why so much activist geeks are on it,
> especially
> >> because I
> >> >>> don't have the feeling that employers use it so
> much in
> >> france(but I
> >> >>> may
> >> >>> be wrong).
> >> >> LinkedIn indeed tend(ed) to spam others, based at
> least on the
> >> >> address book of
> >> >> members.
> >> >> To the best of my knowledge, I do not have an
> account on
> >> LinkedIn.
> >> >> They seem
> >> >> to agree, as I used to get regular invites to join
> LinkedIn,
> >> >> supposedly from
> >> >> members/through members. Although that practice
> seems to
> >> have calmed
> >> >> down
> >> >> lately.
> >> >>
> >> >> So, please do not replace this list by anything like
> >> LinkedIn, until
> >> >> such
> >> >> methods are abolished.
> >> >>
> >> >> Remco
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
>
> --
> https://patdavid.net
> GPG: 66D1 7CA6 8088 4874 946D 18BD 67C7 6219 89E9 57AC
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20190127/a4b19247/attachment.html>
More information about the Digikam-users
mailing list