[digiKam-users] Much slower dk 6b2

[Maik Qualmann]

And the drive with the images collection and database is located on a local, 
USB or network drive?

Maik

Am Freitag, 2. November 2018, 15:33:58 CET schrieb digikam at 911networks.com:
> On Fri, 02 Nov 2018 08:04:38 +0100
> 
> Maik Qualmann <metzpinguin at gmail.com> wrote:
> > The 55 seconds are already too long. And digiKam-6.0.0-beta2 has
> > become faster. With your collection size I would expect 2-5
> > seconds. How many images does the search return?
> 
> Around 12000 images.
> 
> > Maik
> > 
> > Am Donnerstag, 1. November 2018, 16:47:08 CET schrieb
> > 
> > digikam at 911networks.com:
> > > DK 6b2 appimage: 30-Oct
> > > 
> > > I did a backup of my 5.9 dbs and converted to 6b2 appimage (dated:
> > > 30-Oct). It's nicer but it's much slower, especially the searches.
> > > 
> > > digikam version 6.0.0-beta2
> > > Images:
> > > GIF: 4
> > > JPG: 859
> > > PNG: 16
> > > PSD: 45
> > > RAW-CR2: 29902
> > > RAW-DNG: 8443
> > > RAW-PEF: 1764
> > > RAW-RAF: 5641
> > > TIFF: 302
> > > XCF: 5
> > > total: 46981
> > > 
> > > Total Items: 46981
> > > Albums: 296
> > > Tags: 138
> > > 
> > > Database backend: QSQLITE
> > > Database Path: /drive-b/photos/
> > > 
> > > A search of photos:
> > > * 7 tags (in one of)
> > > * and not 1 tag
> > > 
> > > in 6b2: 2 minutes 36 seconds
> > > in 5.9: 55 or 56 seconds (timed by hand)
> > > 
> > > How can speed it up? or is it some debug code?
> > > 
> > > Thanks