Thumbnails not color-managed + severely distorted shadow tonality for thumbs, previews
Andrey Goreev
aegoreev at gmail.com
Wed Nov 15 20:16:17 GMT 2017
Try to play with settings in the following tabs:
Settings - Configure digiKam - Image - RAW Behavior
Settings - Configure digiKam - Views - Preview
On Wednesday, November 15, 2017 1:08:59 PM MST, Elle Stone wrote:
> On 11/15/2017 02:08 PM, Maik Qualmann wrote:
>> The thumbnails are color managed. But the color depth of the thumbnails is
>> only 8 bit, that's probably the cause.
>
> Hmm, no, on my monitor, if color management isn't being used,
> the image has a slight magenta color cast. All the digiKam
> thumbnails have a slight magenta color cast that for example
> changes the color of blue skies to make them slightly more
> purple, and also gives grayscale images a slight magenta color
> cast. This is completely separate from and independent of the
> crushed/posterized shadows in the thumbnails. The previews don't
> have the magenta color cast, but the thumbnails do.
>
> But yes, the fact that the thumbnails are 8-bits accounts for
> the crushed/posterized shadows for the thumbnails, but hopefully
> not also for the previews. Are the previews 8-bits also? Because
> the tonality in the previews doesn't have the type of posterized
> shadows I'd expect from a linear gamma 8-bit image. Rather the
> shadows are crushed with fairly abrupt transitions but not
> completely posterized tonal shifts.
>
> Now that you've explained why the shadows are posterized for
> the thumbnails, I should have realized that was the issue - I
> suspect thumbnails are only 8-bits fairly universally. But
> magenta color cast for the thumbnails is another issue
> altogether.
>
> If you are saying the thumbnails *should* be color-managed (and
> the settings would indicate that yes, they should be), how do I
> troubleshoot why they are showing the typical (for my monitor,
> no doubt not for all monitors) magenta color cast that results
> when I view images in non-color-managed applications?
>
>
>
>
--
Thanks,
Andrey
More information about the Digikam-users
mailing list