Group JPG and RAW

Tue Jan 10 17:34:05 GMT 2017

Please see the attached screenshot. This is what I have seen in another
software. I am not saying we should copy it but when I just started using
the soft I found that option right away without reading manuals or asking
the community.
[image: Inline image 1]

Best regards,
Andrey Goreev

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles at gmail.com>
wrote:

> At least "Group by Type" must be "Group by Type-Mime". Type Mime is
> already used in setup dialog.
>
> Take a care. Wikipedia said that media type must be used instead type mime
> tp prevent confusion. I'm not agree. Media is a support of data, as network
> stream, removable device, etc... Not only a file.
>
> Gilles Caulier
>
>
> 2017-01-10 17:54 GMT+01:00 Christoph Huckle <chrihuc at gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> In the past I would have agreed with your explanation about grouping by
>> type, but after thinking about it, the group's don't hold images of the
>> same type and that's what grouping by type means.
>> So, I apologize for picking that expression and am the opinion that
>> correct would be grouping by name.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Christoph
>>
>> Simon Frei <freisim93 at gmail.com> schrieb am Di., 10. Jan. 2017, 17:30:
>>
>>> Hi Andrey,
>>>
>>> I completely agree that the naming of grouping is confusing. Do you have
>>> a suggestion how the two functionalities could be named instead?
>>> One is grouping icons by album/format/not at all in the main view
>>> (that's why it is in the "View" menu) and the other groups actual image
>>> files together (->context menu).
>>> Maybe the view grouping could be called structure instead of group and
>>> keeping group terminology for images. I am not a native English speaker, so
>>> I am very unsure on the subject.
>>>
>>> Regarding "Group selected by type": This says exactly what it does: It
>>> groups any file ("name.extension") that shares name but has a different
>>> extension. So 00001.arw is grouped together with 00001.jpg, but also with
>>> 00001.tif or any other extension.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Simon
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/01/17 17:04, Andrey Goreev wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Christoph,
>>>
>>> Thank you a ton for your contribution!
>>>
>>> I have been actually looking for that group RAW / JPG option in
>>> "(Menubar) - View - Group Images".
>>> The fact that that menu menu does match the "Right click (on images) -
>>> Group" menu is pretty confusing. Plus, again, the option is called "Group
>>> selected by type" instead of "Group RAW and JPG" so I bet there are many
>>> users out there that have no idea the option actually exists.
>>> Just some thoughts.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Andrey Goreev
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 6:24 AM, Simon Frei <freisim93 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Christoph,
>>>
>>> First: 5.4.0 is out: https://www.digikam.org/node/764
>>> It isn't anything big, nevertheless important (at least for my
>>> workflow).
>>> Citing from the release text:
>>>
>>>     Grouped items are now processed together. Previously operations
>>>     would only apply to the top image in the group (i.e. the image
>>>     displayed when grouped images are hidden). In other words, applying,
>>>     for example, a tag to a top image in a group will assign the tag to
>>>     all images in this group.
>>>
>>> On 10/01/17 10:33, Christoph Huckle wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Both,
>>>
>>> Sorry you are correct, I picked the wrong expression...
>>> @Simon, I'm not fully in the loop, as I'm not a team member, just
>>> programmed that feature for myself and then in made it's way upstream :)
>>> but what are the cases you are talking about, which will be fixed in 5.4.0?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Christoph
>>>
>>> Andrey Goreev <aegoreev at gmail.com> schrieb am Mo., 9. Jan. 2017 um
>>> 19:34 Uhr:
>>>
>>> Hello Simon,
>>>
>>> It actually worked! Thank you!
>>>
>>> To be honestly I thought "group by type" means group by extension. RAW
>>> and JPG files are different type but same file name for me.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Andrey Goreev
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 3:50 AM, Simon Frei <freisim93 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I haven't read those conversations, but grouping by extension is
>>> implemented. I use it frequently. The behaviour was somewhat strange
>>> (grouped images were not in all appropriate cases processed together), but
>>> that will  be corrected in 5.4.0.
>>> To group raw and jpg, select all to be grouped images (so all jpg and
>>> raw files) and in the context menu select group -> group selected by type.
>>>
>>> On 03/01/17 23:56, Andrey Goreev wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I have read the following threads but could not understand what the
>>> actual status is.
>>>
>>> https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/2015-August/021374.html
>>> https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/2010-September/011117.html
>>>
>>> That feature is very useful for the culling process.
>>> Please let me know if I could be of any help in getting this feature
>>> released.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Andrey Goreev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Christoph Huckle
>>>
>>> Unterm Aspalter 22
>>> 5106 Veltheim
>>>
>>> 076 419 62 61
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>> Christoph Huckle
>>
>> Unterm Aspalter 22
>> 5106 Veltheim
>>
>> 076 419 62 61
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20170110/f70b42ef/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 51409 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20170110/f70b42ef/attachment.png>