digikam default options
Andrey Goreev
aegoreev at gmail.com
Sat Jan 14 15:38:06 GMT 2017
I don't agree. Any options that can "harm" an inattentive user. Any date changes are a harm.For example, I installed digikam and imported my pictures. Some of them went to Miscellaneous / Places / zoo instead of Places / zoo. For sure I changed it right away but I was not aware of that timestamp update option being turned on and changed the date of 300+ files.For sure it might be considered as a user issue but again, I think user should be protected. Let's at least allow users to turn that option on/off in the initial setup wizard.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
-------- Original message --------From: Remco Viƫtor <remco.vietor at wanadoo.fr> Date: 2017-01-14 8:11 AM (GMT-07:00) To: digiKam - Home Manage your photographs as a professional with the power of open source <digikam-users at kde.org> Subject: Re: digikam default options
On samedi 14 janvier 2017 07:30:08 CET Andrey Goreev wrote:
> Well, I take pictures to capture moments. So why should the date of the
> moment be changed if I simply added an info in order to be able to find
> that picture later ?
There is a tag reflecting the time the image was taken. That one is not (and
should not be) modified on any update, afaik.
Also, we were talking about the best default for a configuration option. If
you do not like the default, you can change it.
But for me, a timestamp that's supposed to record the date/time an image was
changed should _as_a_default_ do exactly that, to avoid surprising (new)
users.
Remco.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20170114/52e51085/attachment.html>
More information about the Digikam-users
mailing list