Digikam raw files and darktable

[Juan Jose Casafranca]

And that is my intentionm not replacing the raw editoe but calling the
external one to receive the edited image

El 13 ene. 2017 5:01 PM, "cerp" <cerp at eeos.biz> escribió:

> Dear all,
>
> Then we would need to have a fork for RawTherapee, one for LightZone
> (which I both prefer to Darktable for RAF file editing) and so on ....
> would it not be better to have a mechanism to use the preferred editor?
>
> Best Regards
>
> Quoting Andrey Goreev <aegoreev at gmail.com>:
>
> I agree 100% but digikam devs have their own point of view on how the
>> program should look like and we need to respect it.
>> This is how fork projects appear. If it is not too complicated to replace
>> libraw with darktable a fork could be not a bad idea.
>> Someone will have to maintain it though, new versions of both digikam and
>> darktable come out pretty frequently.
>>
>> Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
>> -------- Original message --------From: Juan Jose Casafranca <
>> jjcasmar at gmail.com> Date: 2017-01-13  8:29 AM  (GMT-07:00) To: digiKam -
>> Home Manage your photographs as a professional with the power of open
>> source <digikam-users at kde.org> Cc: gimp-user-list at gnome.org,
>> darktable-user <darktable-user at lists.darktable.org> Subject: Re: Digikam
>> raw files and darktable
>> Thanks Albrecht, that's exactly my opinion and the reason I want to
>> develop this module :-)
>> 2017-01-12 15:15 GMT+01:00 J Albrecht <heviiguy at gmail.com>:
>>
>> On 07 Jan 2017, at 09:41, Juan Jose Casafranca <jjcasmar at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> They need a way to organize
>> their library, which DK is good at, and a way to process raw files, which
>> DT is
>> good at (DK is not a good raw processor and DT is not good for library
>> management).
>> For the Developer’s benefit, I’d like to reiterate the above statement:
>> digiKam is a brilliant program but please, let’s maintain the focus on
>> where it is brilliant rather than trying to craft it into an
>> all-singing-all-dancing piece of bloatware comprising relatively mediocre
>> modules just for the sake of doing so. In the FOSS realm, digikam is an
>> excellent Digital Asset Management program, darktable is, IMHO, the best
>> Raw editor and GIMP is unparalleled for post-processing. It’s folly and
>> perhaps a bit arrogant to assume that Users would willingly be hobbled by
>> using only one program simply because they are “loyal” to that program.
>> Wouldn’t it be nice if we could just all get along….
>>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20170113/3b8c5a83/attachment.html>