Digikam raw files and darktable

[cerp]

Dear all,

Then we would need to have a fork for RawTherapee, one for LightZone  
(which I both prefer to Darktable for RAF file editing) and so on ....  
would it not be better to have a mechanism to use the preferred editor?

Best Regards

Quoting Andrey Goreev <aegoreev at gmail.com>:

> I agree 100% but digikam devs have their own point of view on how  
> the program should look like and we need to respect it.
> This is how fork projects appear. If it is not too complicated to  
> replace libraw with darktable a fork could be not a bad idea.
> Someone will have to maintain it though, new versions of both  
> digikam and darktable come out pretty frequently.
>
> Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
> -------- Original message --------From: Juan Jose Casafranca  
> <jjcasmar at gmail.com> Date: 2017-01-13  8:29 AM  (GMT-07:00) To:  
> digiKam - Home Manage your photographs as a professional with the  
> power of open source <digikam-users at kde.org> Cc:  
> gimp-user-list at gnome.org, darktable-user  
> <darktable-user at lists.darktable.org> Subject: Re: Digikam raw files  
> and darktable
> Thanks Albrecht, that's exactly my opinion and the reason I want to  
> develop this module :-)
> 2017-01-12 15:15 GMT+01:00 J Albrecht <heviiguy at gmail.com>:
>
> On 07 Jan 2017, at 09:41, Juan Jose Casafranca <jjcasmar at gmail.com> wrote:
> They need a way to organize 
> their library, which DK is good at, and a way to process raw files,  
> which DT is 
> good at (DK is not a good raw processor and DT is not good for library 
> management).
> For the Developer’s benefit, I’d like to reiterate the above  
> statement: digiKam is a brilliant program but please, let’s maintain  
> the focus on where it is brilliant rather than trying to craft it  
> into an all-singing-all-dancing piece of bloatware comprising  
> relatively mediocre modules just for the sake of doing so. In the  
> FOSS realm, digikam is an excellent Digital Asset Management  
> program, darktable is, IMHO, the best Raw editor and GIMP is  
> unparalleled for post-processing. It’s folly and perhaps a bit  
> arrogant to assume that Users would willingly be hobbled by using  
> only one program simply because they are “loyal” to that program.
> Wouldn’t it be nice if we could just all get along….