Digikam raw files and darktable

[Juan Jose Casafranca]

Thanks Albrecht, that's exactly my opinion and the reason I want to develop
this module :-)

2017-01-12 15:15 GMT+01:00 J Albrecht <heviiguy at gmail.com>:

>
> On 07 Jan 2017, at 09:41, Juan Jose Casafranca <jjcasmar at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> They need a way to organize
> their library, which DK is good at, and a way to process raw files, which
> DT is
> good at (DK is not a good raw processor and DT is not good for library
> management).
>
>
> For the Developer’s benefit, I’d like to reiterate the above statement:
> digiKam is a brilliant program but please, let’s maintain the focus on
> where it is brilliant rather than trying to craft it into an
> all-singing-all-dancing piece of bloatware comprising relatively mediocre
> modules just for the sake of doing so. In the FOSS realm, digikam is an
> excellent Digital Asset Management program, darktable is, IMHO, the best
> Raw editor and GIMP is unparalleled for post-processing. It’s folly and
> perhaps a bit arrogant to assume that Users would willingly be hobbled by
> using only one program simply because they are “loyal” to that program.
>
> Wouldn’t it be nice if we could just all get along….
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20170113/cf9e8e02/attachment.html>