missing thumbails in digikam

Mon Jan 9 17:51:37 GMT 2017

Ok will test it when back home

Le 9 janv. 2017 18:48, "Andrey Goreev" <aegoreev at gmail.com> a écrit :

> I bet they will show up after you check the box "show all versions"
> I have had this issue before
>
> Best regards,
> Andrey Goreev
>
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Frederic Chaume <
> frederic.chaume at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Andrey
>> In table view I see all 10 correct thumbnails as before. In the thumbnail
>> view, I only see 3 correct ones  (don't have any empty thumbnails )
>> Regards
>>
>> Le 9 janv. 2017 18:29, "Andrey Goreev" <aegoreev at gmail.com> a écrit :
>>
>> Do you see empty squares instead of the thumbnails or all you can see is
>> just the three files with thumbnails and nothing else?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Andrey Goreev
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Frédéric Chaume <
>> frederic.chaume at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Gilles
>>>
>>>
>>> will try it somewhere this week.
>>>
>>> just notice that in the table view I see all the pictures with thier
>>> thumbnails, problem is only in the thumbnails view
>>>
>>> to Maik
>>>
>>> what are the options to set ?
>>>
>>>
>>> regards
>>>
>>> frederic
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 08/01/2017 à 23:07, Gilles Caulier a écrit :
>>>
>>> Ok, next stage is simple.
>>>
>>> 1/ create fe fresh account on your system
>>> 2/ log to this account
>>> 3/ start digiKam and create a clean setup with an empty collection
>>> 4/ import suspect JPEG in your collection
>>> 5/ check if problem is reproducible.
>>>
>>> Gilles Caulier
>>>
>>> 2017-01-08 20:53 GMT+01:00 Frédéric Chaume <frederic.chaume at gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> Hi Gilles
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Done
>>>>
>>>> (but ity was working like this since months)
>>>>
>>>> frederic at Fred-PC ~/Images/Public/2016/2016-01_ballade_plougrescant $ ls
>>>> 20160212_164025.jpg  20160212_165705.jpg  20160212_165732.jpg
>>>> 20160213_103343.jpg
>>>> 20160212_164033.jpg  20160212_165709.jpg  20160212_165736.jpg
>>>> 20160212_164235.jpg  20160212_165723.jpg  20160212_165739.jpg
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> and
>>>>
>>>> igikam.dimg: "/home/frederic/Images/Public/
>>>> 2016/2016-01_ballade_plougrescant/20160213_103343.jpg"  : JPEG file
>>>> identified
>>>> digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation =>  1
>>>> digikam.general: One job is done
>>>>
>>>> .....
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> but no change
>>>>
>>>> disk space is 88% full
>>>>
>>>> regards
>>>>
>>>> frederic
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Le 08/01/2017 à 20:18, Gilles Caulier a écrit :
>>>>
>>>> Nothing special here. No error reported.
>>>>
>>>> Just to test. Can you change a file name from :
>>>>
>>>> 2016-01 ballade à Plougrescant/20160212_165723.jpg
>>>>
>>>> 2016-01_ballade_a_Plougrescant/20160212_165723.jpg
>>>>
>>>> ==> remove space and replace 'à' by 'a'.
>>>>
>>>> Gilles Caulier
>>>>
>>>> 2017-01-08 20:15 GMT+01:00 Frédéric Chaume <
>>>> <frederic.chaume at gmail.com>frederic.chaume at gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Gilles
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> here are the trace after F5
>>>>>
>>>>> digikam.general: One job is done
>>>>> digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation =>  1
>>>>> digikam.dimg: "/home/frederic/Images/Public/2016/2016-01 ballade à
>>>>> Plougrescant/20160212_165723.jpg"  : JPEG file identified
>>>>> digikam.general: One job is done
>>>>> digikam.dimg: "/home/frederic/Images/Public/2016/2016-01 ballade à
>>>>> Plougrescant/20160212_165739.jpg"  : JPEG file identified
>>>>> digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation =>  1
>>>>> digikam.general: One job is done
>>>>> digikam.dimg: "/home/frederic/Images/Public/2016/2016-01 ballade à
>>>>> Plougrescant/20160212_165705.jpg"  : JPEG file identified
>>>>> digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation =>  1
>>>>> digikam.general: One job is done
>>>>> digikam.dimg: "/home/frederic/Images/Public/2016/2016-01 ballade à
>>>>> Plougrescant/20160212_165736.jpg"  : JPEG file identified
>>>>> digikam.general: One job is done
>>>>> digikam.dimg: "/home/frederic/Images/Public/2016/2016-01 ballade à
>>>>> Plougrescant/20160212_164235.jpg"  : JPEG file identified
>>>>> digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation =>  1
>>>>> digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation =>  1
>>>>> digikam.general: One job is done
>>>>> digikam.general: One job is done
>>>>> digikam.dimg: "/home/frederic/Images/Public/2016/2016-01 ballade à
>>>>> Plougrescant/20160212_165732.jpg"  : JPEG file identified
>>>>> digikam.dimg: "/home/frederic/Images/Public/2016/2016-01 ballade à
>>>>> Plougrescant/20160212_164025.jpg"  : JPEG file identified
>>>>> digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation =>  1
>>>>> digikam.general: One job is done
>>>>> digikam.general: One job is done
>>>>> digikam.general: Cancel Main Thread
>>>>> digikam.general: One job is done
>>>>> digikam.dimg: "/home/frederic/Images/Public/2016/2016-01 ballade à
>>>>> Plougrescant/20160212_164033.jpg"  : JPEG file identified
>>>>> digikam.dimg: "/home/frederic/Images/Public/2016/2016-01 ballade à
>>>>> Plougrescant/20160212_164033.jpg"  : JPEG file identified
>>>>> digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation =>  1
>>>>> digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation =>  1
>>>>> digikam.general: One job is done
>>>>> digikam.general: List of Pending Jobs is empty
>>>>> digikam.general: Event is dispatched to desktop notifier through DBUS
>>>>> digikam.general: Cancel Main Thread
>>>>> digikam.general: Cancel Main Thread
>>>>> digikam.geoiface: ----
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Le 08/01/2017 à 17:50, Gilles Caulier a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>> no. there is no suitable debug trace here. When you is in suppected
>>>>> album press F5 to force to refresh thumbnails.
>>>>>
>>>>> What's the trace on the console in this case.
>>>>>
>>>>> thumb DB is small on start because it's empty and mus be populated
>>>>> step by step or with maintenance tool.
>>>>>
>>>>> Gilles Caulier
>>>>>
>>>>> 2017-01-08 17:21 GMT+01:00 Frédéric Chaume <
>>>>> <frederic.chaume at gmail.com>frederic.chaume at gmail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Gilles
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm using 5.4.0-01
>>>>>>
>>>>>> proceeded as you suggested
>>>>>>
>>>>>> renamed the db and start it again
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 402M janv.  8 13:32
>>>>>> thumbnails-digikam.db.sav
>>>>>> -rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 4,1M janv.  8 17:08 recognition.db
>>>>>> -rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users  21M janv.  8 17:08 digikam4.db
>>>>>> -rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 7,5M janv.  8 17:11 thumbnails-digikam.db
>>>>>>
>>>>>> unfortunately the result is the same :-(, still missing the sames
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (I suppose the difference between size will be reduced  as I will go
>>>>>> trhough each folder, right ?)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> when I look at the logs from the terminal I found the lines below
>>>>>> relatives to one of the picture not shown
>>>>>>
>>>>>> digikam.dimg: "/home/frederic/Images/Public/
>>>>>> 2016/2016-01xxxxxx/20160212_165709.jpg"  : JPEG file identified
>>>>>> digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation =>  1
>>>>>> digikam.geoiface: ----
>>>>>> Recreating ksycoca file ("/home/frederic/.cache/ksycoc
>>>>>> a5_fr_ao0C4YqXkXGF5j1o5s7kezL5ncg=", version 303)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> can it help ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> regards
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Le 08/01/2017 à 14:37, Gilles Caulier a écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Which digiKam version do you use ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is no special settings in RC files for thumbnails. But the
>>>>>> digikam thumbs database store all wavelets small images. Stop digiKam,
>>>>>> rename this database file, and restart, it will be created from scratch.
>>>>>> It's solve your problem ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Gilles Caulier
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2017-01-08 13:27 GMT+01:00 Frédéric Chaume <
>>>>>> <frederic.chaume at gmail.com>frederic.chaume at gmail.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi All
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> when looking some collection, I see several thumbnails are missing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have for example one which contains 10 pictures (as shown in the
>>>>>>> collection title and in the folder), but only see 3 thumbnails and I have
>>>>>>> no filter activated
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> hopefully pictures are still present in the folder (in bold those I
>>>>>>> see in digikam):
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ~/Images/Public/2016/2016-01$ ls -alh
>>>>>>> total 26492drwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 4,0K nov.  26 11:18 .
>>>>>>> drwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users  12K déc.  25 12:00 ..
>>>>>>> *-rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 1,7M nov.  26 11:18 20160212_164025.jpg*
>>>>>>> -rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 2,1M nov.  26 11:17 20160212_164033.jpg
>>>>>>> -rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 2,4M nov.  26 11:18 20160212_164235.jpg
>>>>>>> *-rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 2,7M nov.  26 11:17 20160212_165705.jpg*
>>>>>>> -rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 2,1M nov.  26 11:17 20160212_165709.jpg
>>>>>>> -rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 4,0M nov.  26 11:18 20160212_165723.jpg
>>>>>>> -rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 3,5M nov.  26 11:17 20160212_165732.jpg
>>>>>>> -rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 3,8M nov.  26 11:18 20160212_165736.jpg
>>>>>>> -rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 3,4M nov.  26 11:18 20160212_165739.jpg
>>>>>>> *-rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 631K nov.  26 11:17 20160213_103343.jpg*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have created a new configuration from scratch (after removing
>>>>>>> digikamrc) but same result
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> thanks for helping
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> regards
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> frederic
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20170109/78747232/attachment.html>