missing thumbails in digikam
Andrey Goreev
aegoreev at gmail.com
Mon Jan 9 17:47:38 GMT 2017
I bet they will show up after you check the box "show all versions"
I have had this issue before
Best regards,
Andrey Goreev
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Frederic Chaume <frederic.chaume at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Andrey
> In table view I see all 10 correct thumbnails as before. In the thumbnail
> view, I only see 3 correct ones (don't have any empty thumbnails )
> Regards
>
> Le 9 janv. 2017 18:29, "Andrey Goreev" <aegoreev at gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> Do you see empty squares instead of the thumbnails or all you can see is
> just the three files with thumbnails and nothing else?
>
> Best regards,
> Andrey Goreev
>
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Frédéric Chaume <
> frederic.chaume at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Gilles
>>
>>
>> will try it somewhere this week.
>>
>> just notice that in the table view I see all the pictures with thier
>> thumbnails, problem is only in the thumbnails view
>>
>> to Maik
>>
>> what are the options to set ?
>>
>>
>> regards
>>
>> frederic
>>
>>
>>
>> Le 08/01/2017 à 23:07, Gilles Caulier a écrit :
>>
>> Ok, next stage is simple.
>>
>> 1/ create fe fresh account on your system
>> 2/ log to this account
>> 3/ start digiKam and create a clean setup with an empty collection
>> 4/ import suspect JPEG in your collection
>> 5/ check if problem is reproducible.
>>
>> Gilles Caulier
>>
>> 2017-01-08 20:53 GMT+01:00 Frédéric Chaume <frederic.chaume at gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Hi Gilles
>>>
>>>
>>> Done
>>>
>>> (but ity was working like this since months)
>>>
>>> frederic at Fred-PC ~/Images/Public/2016/2016-01_ballade_plougrescant $ ls
>>> 20160212_164025.jpg 20160212_165705.jpg 20160212_165732.jpg
>>> 20160213_103343.jpg
>>> 20160212_164033.jpg 20160212_165709.jpg 20160212_165736.jpg
>>> 20160212_164235.jpg 20160212_165723.jpg 20160212_165739.jpg
>>>
>>>
>>> and
>>>
>>> igikam.dimg: "/home/frederic/Images/Public/
>>> 2016/2016-01_ballade_plougrescant/20160213_103343.jpg" : JPEG file
>>> identified
>>> digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1
>>> digikam.general: One job is done
>>>
>>> .....
>>>
>>>
>>> but no change
>>>
>>> disk space is 88% full
>>>
>>> regards
>>>
>>> frederic
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 08/01/2017 à 20:18, Gilles Caulier a écrit :
>>>
>>> Nothing special here. No error reported.
>>>
>>> Just to test. Can you change a file name from :
>>>
>>> 2016-01 ballade à Plougrescant/20160212_165723.jpg
>>>
>>> 2016-01_ballade_a_Plougrescant/20160212_165723.jpg
>>>
>>> ==> remove space and replace 'à' by 'a'.
>>>
>>> Gilles Caulier
>>>
>>> 2017-01-08 20:15 GMT+01:00 Frédéric Chaume < <frederic.chaume at gmail.com>
>>> frederic.chaume at gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> Hi Gilles
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> here are the trace after F5
>>>>
>>>> digikam.general: One job is done
>>>> digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1
>>>> digikam.dimg: "/home/frederic/Images/Public/2016/2016-01 ballade à
>>>> Plougrescant/20160212_165723.jpg" : JPEG file identified
>>>> digikam.general: One job is done
>>>> digikam.dimg: "/home/frederic/Images/Public/2016/2016-01 ballade à
>>>> Plougrescant/20160212_165739.jpg" : JPEG file identified
>>>> digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1
>>>> digikam.general: One job is done
>>>> digikam.dimg: "/home/frederic/Images/Public/2016/2016-01 ballade à
>>>> Plougrescant/20160212_165705.jpg" : JPEG file identified
>>>> digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1
>>>> digikam.general: One job is done
>>>> digikam.dimg: "/home/frederic/Images/Public/2016/2016-01 ballade à
>>>> Plougrescant/20160212_165736.jpg" : JPEG file identified
>>>> digikam.general: One job is done
>>>> digikam.dimg: "/home/frederic/Images/Public/2016/2016-01 ballade à
>>>> Plougrescant/20160212_164235.jpg" : JPEG file identified
>>>> digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1
>>>> digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1
>>>> digikam.general: One job is done
>>>> digikam.general: One job is done
>>>> digikam.dimg: "/home/frederic/Images/Public/2016/2016-01 ballade à
>>>> Plougrescant/20160212_165732.jpg" : JPEG file identified
>>>> digikam.dimg: "/home/frederic/Images/Public/2016/2016-01 ballade à
>>>> Plougrescant/20160212_164025.jpg" : JPEG file identified
>>>> digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1
>>>> digikam.general: One job is done
>>>> digikam.general: One job is done
>>>> digikam.general: Cancel Main Thread
>>>> digikam.general: One job is done
>>>> digikam.dimg: "/home/frederic/Images/Public/2016/2016-01 ballade à
>>>> Plougrescant/20160212_164033.jpg" : JPEG file identified
>>>> digikam.dimg: "/home/frederic/Images/Public/2016/2016-01 ballade à
>>>> Plougrescant/20160212_164033.jpg" : JPEG file identified
>>>> digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1
>>>> digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1
>>>> digikam.general: One job is done
>>>> digikam.general: List of Pending Jobs is empty
>>>> digikam.general: Event is dispatched to desktop notifier through DBUS
>>>> digikam.general: Cancel Main Thread
>>>> digikam.general: Cancel Main Thread
>>>> digikam.geoiface: ----
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Le 08/01/2017 à 17:50, Gilles Caulier a écrit :
>>>>
>>>> no. there is no suitable debug trace here. When you is in suppected
>>>> album press F5 to force to refresh thumbnails.
>>>>
>>>> What's the trace on the console in this case.
>>>>
>>>> thumb DB is small on start because it's empty and mus be populated step
>>>> by step or with maintenance tool.
>>>>
>>>> Gilles Caulier
>>>>
>>>> 2017-01-08 17:21 GMT+01:00 Frédéric Chaume <
>>>> <frederic.chaume at gmail.com>frederic.chaume at gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Gilles
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm using 5.4.0-01
>>>>>
>>>>> proceeded as you suggested
>>>>>
>>>>> renamed the db and start it again
>>>>>
>>>>> -rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 402M janv. 8 13:32
>>>>> thumbnails-digikam.db.sav
>>>>> -rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 4,1M janv. 8 17:08 recognition.db
>>>>> -rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 21M janv. 8 17:08 digikam4.db
>>>>> -rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 7,5M janv. 8 17:11 thumbnails-digikam.db
>>>>>
>>>>> unfortunately the result is the same :-(, still missing the sames
>>>>>
>>>>> (I suppose the difference between size will be reduced as I will go
>>>>> trhough each folder, right ?)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> when I look at the logs from the terminal I found the lines below
>>>>> relatives to one of the picture not shown
>>>>>
>>>>> digikam.dimg: "/home/frederic/Images/Public/
>>>>> 2016/2016-01xxxxxx/20160212_165709.jpg" : JPEG file identified
>>>>> digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1
>>>>> digikam.geoiface: ----
>>>>> Recreating ksycoca file ("/home/frederic/.cache/ksycoc
>>>>> a5_fr_ao0C4YqXkXGF5j1o5s7kezL5ncg=", version 303)
>>>>>
>>>>> can it help ?
>>>>>
>>>>> regards
>>>>>
>>>>> Le 08/01/2017 à 14:37, Gilles Caulier a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>> Which digiKam version do you use ?
>>>>>
>>>>> There is no special settings in RC files for thumbnails. But the
>>>>> digikam thumbs database store all wavelets small images. Stop digiKam,
>>>>> rename this database file, and restart, it will be created from scratch.
>>>>> It's solve your problem ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Gilles Caulier
>>>>>
>>>>> 2017-01-08 13:27 GMT+01:00 Frédéric Chaume <
>>>>> <frederic.chaume at gmail.com>frederic.chaume at gmail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi All
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> when looking some collection, I see several thumbnails are missing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have for example one which contains 10 pictures (as shown in the
>>>>>> collection title and in the folder), but only see 3 thumbnails and I have
>>>>>> no filter activated
>>>>>>
>>>>>> hopefully pictures are still present in the folder (in bold those I
>>>>>> see in digikam):
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ~/Images/Public/2016/2016-01$ ls -alh
>>>>>> total 26492drwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 4,0K nov. 26 11:18 .
>>>>>> drwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 12K déc. 25 12:00 ..
>>>>>> *-rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 1,7M nov. 26 11:18 20160212_164025.jpg*
>>>>>> -rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 2,1M nov. 26 11:17 20160212_164033.jpg
>>>>>> -rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 2,4M nov. 26 11:18 20160212_164235.jpg
>>>>>> *-rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 2,7M nov. 26 11:17 20160212_165705.jpg*
>>>>>> -rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 2,1M nov. 26 11:17 20160212_165709.jpg
>>>>>> -rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 4,0M nov. 26 11:18 20160212_165723.jpg
>>>>>> -rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 3,5M nov. 26 11:17 20160212_165732.jpg
>>>>>> -rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 3,8M nov. 26 11:18 20160212_165736.jpg
>>>>>> -rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 3,4M nov. 26 11:18 20160212_165739.jpg
>>>>>> *-rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 631K nov. 26 11:17 20160213_103343.jpg*
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have created a new configuration from scratch (after removing
>>>>>> digikamrc) but same result
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thanks for helping
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> regards
>>>>>>
>>>>>> frederic
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20170109/814b170e/attachment.html>
More information about the Digikam-users
mailing list