missing thumbails in digikam
Frédéric Chaume
frederic.chaume at gmail.com
Sun Jan 8 19:53:13 GMT 2017
Hi Gilles
Done
(but ity was working like this since months)
frederic at Fred-PC ~/Images/Public/2016/2016-01_ballade_plougrescant $ ls
20160212_164025.jpg 20160212_165705.jpg 20160212_165732.jpg
20160213_103343.jpg
20160212_164033.jpg 20160212_165709.jpg 20160212_165736.jpg
20160212_164235.jpg 20160212_165723.jpg 20160212_165739.jpg
and
igikam.dimg:
"/home/frederic/Images/Public/2016/2016-01_ballade_plougrescant/20160213_103343.jpg"
: JPEG file identified
digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1
digikam.general: One job is done
.....
but no change
disk space is 88% full
regards
frederic
Le 08/01/2017 à 20:18, Gilles Caulier a écrit :
> Nothing special here. No error reported.
>
> Just to test. Can you change a file name from :
>
> 2016-01 ballade à Plougrescant/20160212_165723.jpg
>
> 2016-01_ballade_a_Plougrescant/20160212_165723.jpg
>
> ==> remove space and replace 'à' by 'a'.
>
> Gilles Caulier
>
> 2017-01-08 20:15 GMT+01:00 Frédéric Chaume <frederic.chaume at gmail.com
> <mailto:frederic.chaume at gmail.com>>:
>
> Hi Gilles
>
>
> here are the trace after F5
>
> digikam.general: One job is done
> digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1
> digikam.dimg: "/home/frederic/Images/Public/2016/2016-01 ballade à
> Plougrescant/20160212_165723.jpg" : JPEG file identified
> digikam.general: One job is done
> digikam.dimg: "/home/frederic/Images/Public/2016/2016-01 ballade à
> Plougrescant/20160212_165739.jpg" : JPEG file identified
> digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1
> digikam.general: One job is done
> digikam.dimg: "/home/frederic/Images/Public/2016/2016-01 ballade à
> Plougrescant/20160212_165705.jpg" : JPEG file identified
> digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1
> digikam.general: One job is done
> digikam.dimg: "/home/frederic/Images/Public/2016/2016-01 ballade à
> Plougrescant/20160212_165736.jpg" : JPEG file identified
> digikam.general: One job is done
> digikam.dimg: "/home/frederic/Images/Public/2016/2016-01 ballade à
> Plougrescant/20160212_164235.jpg" : JPEG file identified
> digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1
> digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1
> digikam.general: One job is done
> digikam.general: One job is done
> digikam.dimg: "/home/frederic/Images/Public/2016/2016-01 ballade à
> Plougrescant/20160212_165732.jpg" : JPEG file identified
> digikam.dimg: "/home/frederic/Images/Public/2016/2016-01 ballade à
> Plougrescant/20160212_164025.jpg" : JPEG file identified
> digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1
> digikam.general: One job is done
> digikam.general: One job is done
> digikam.general: Cancel Main Thread
> digikam.general: One job is done
> digikam.dimg: "/home/frederic/Images/Public/2016/2016-01 ballade à
> Plougrescant/20160212_164033.jpg" : JPEG file identified
> digikam.dimg: "/home/frederic/Images/Public/2016/2016-01 ballade à
> Plougrescant/20160212_164033.jpg" : JPEG file identified
> digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1
> digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1
> digikam.general: One job is done
> digikam.general: List of Pending Jobs is empty
> digikam.general: Event is dispatched to desktop notifier through DBUS
> digikam.general: Cancel Main Thread
> digikam.general: Cancel Main Thread
> digikam.geoiface: ----
>
>
> Le 08/01/2017 à 17:50, Gilles Caulier a écrit :
>> no. there is no suitable debug trace here. When you is in
>> suppected album press F5 to force to refresh thumbnails.
>>
>> What's the trace on the console in this case.
>>
>> thumb DB is small on start because it's empty and mus be
>> populated step by step or with maintenance tool.
>>
>> Gilles Caulier
>>
>> 2017-01-08 17:21 GMT+01:00 Frédéric Chaume
>> <frederic.chaume at gmail.com <mailto:frederic.chaume at gmail.com>>:
>>
>> Hi Gilles
>>
>> I'm using 5.4.0-01
>>
>> proceeded as you suggested
>>
>> renamed the db and start it again
>>
>> -rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 402M janv. 8 13:32
>> thumbnails-digikam.db.sav
>> -rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 4,1M janv. 8 17:08 recognition.db
>> -rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 21M janv. 8 17:08 digikam4.db
>> -rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 7,5M janv. 8 17:11
>> thumbnails-digikam.db
>>
>> unfortunately the result is the same :-(, still missing the sames
>>
>> (I suppose the difference between size will be reduced as I
>> will go trhough each folder, right ?)
>>
>>
>> when I look at the logs from the terminal I found the lines
>> below relatives to one of the picture not shown
>>
>> digikam.dimg:
>> "/home/frederic/Images/Public/2016/2016-01xxxxxx/20160212_165709.jpg"
>> : JPEG file identified
>> digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation => 1
>> digikam.geoiface: ----
>> Recreating ksycoca file
>> ("/home/frederic/.cache/ksycoca5_fr_ao0C4YqXkXGF5j1o5s7kezL5ncg=",
>> version 303)
>>
>> can it help ?
>>
>> regards
>>
>>
>> Le 08/01/2017 à 14:37, Gilles Caulier a écrit :
>>> Which digiKam version do you use ?
>>>
>>> There is no special settings in RC files for thumbnails. But
>>> the digikam thumbs database store all wavelets small images.
>>> Stop digiKam, rename this database file, and restart, it
>>> will be created from scratch. It's solve your problem ?
>>>
>>> Gilles Caulier
>>>
>>> 2017-01-08 13:27 GMT+01:00 Frédéric Chaume
>>> <frederic.chaume at gmail.com <mailto:frederic.chaume at gmail.com>>:
>>>
>>> Hi All
>>>
>>>
>>> when looking some collection, I see several thumbnails
>>> are missing.
>>>
>>> I have for example one which contains 10 pictures (as
>>> shown in the collection title and in the folder), but
>>> only see 3 thumbnails and I have no filter activated
>>>
>>> hopefully pictures are still present in the folder (in
>>> bold those I see in digikam):
>>>
>>> ~/Images/Public/2016/2016-01$ ls -alh
>>> total 26492drwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 4,0K nov. 26 11:18 .
>>> drwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 12K déc. 25 12:00 ..
>>> *-rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 1,7M nov. 26 11:18
>>> 20160212_164025.jpg*
>>> -rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 2,1M nov. 26 11:17
>>> 20160212_164033.jpg
>>> -rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 2,4M nov. 26 11:18
>>> 20160212_164235.jpg
>>> *-rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 2,7M nov. 26 11:17
>>> 20160212_165705.jpg*
>>> -rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 2,1M nov. 26 11:17
>>> 20160212_165709.jpg
>>> -rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 4,0M nov. 26 11:18
>>> 20160212_165723.jpg
>>> -rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 3,5M nov. 26 11:17
>>> 20160212_165732.jpg
>>> -rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 3,8M nov. 26 11:18
>>> 20160212_165736.jpg
>>> -rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 3,4M nov. 26 11:18
>>> 20160212_165739.jpg
>>> *-rwxrwxr-x 1 frederic users 631K nov. 26 11:17
>>> 20160213_103343.jpg*
>>>
>>>
>>> I have created a new configuration from scratch (after
>>> removing digikamrc) but same result
>>>
>>>
>>> thanks for helping
>>>
>>>
>>> regards
>>>
>>> frederic
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20170108/ad341c83/attachment.html>
More information about the Digikam-users
mailing list