Batch Queue Manager: Save modified images the way image editor does

neinei at gmx.net neinei at gmx.net
Tue Nov 8 12:41:43 GMT 2016


Hi there,
perhaps my issue was not that clear in my original posting. So I try it 
again with different word.

When I process an image in image editor in digiKam 4.1.4 and I save it 
then I see only the modified version in album view. The original image 
is "hidden" below the modified version.

When I built a batch process with the same image operations in Batch 
Queue Manager the resulting modified image is not on top of the original 
image in album view but besides of it. Therefore the result is two 
visible images in album view instead of the expected one (modified) image.

How could I achieve the behavior as seen in the image editor in Batch 
Queue Manager?

Thanks for a hint,
NeiNei



On 06.11.2016 17:58, NeiNei wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I built a batch process in Batch Queue Manager to apply some color
> operations on the original jpg images. The modified pictures of tis
> process are saved as [file]_1.jpg . In album view I see now side by side
> two images:
> -image_a.jpg (original)
> -image_a_v1.jpg (modified by batch queue process)
> Obviously, doubling the number of images bloats the album view.
>
> However, I expect here the same outcome as I would do the same color
> operations in image editor. That is a stacked view where I only see the
> current image (image_a_v1.jpg) and the original image is "hidden".
> How could I achieve this behavior in Batch Queue Manager?
>
>
>
> Thanks for a hint in advance,
> NeiNei
>




More information about the Digikam-users mailing list