[Digikam-users] Mysql/MariaDb database expert needs...
Richard Mortimer
richm+digikam at oldelvet.org.uk
Thu Nov 12 17:12:49 GMT 2015
On 12/11/2015 16:38, Henrique Santos Fernandes wrote:
>
> The one advantage of having separate databases is for backup purposes.
> The thumbnail database in particular can be massive and having it
> separate makes it easier especially since it is basically throwaway data
> anyway.
>
>
> This is true. But still easy to remove or drop the tables related to it.
> Only "problem" would be the backup size, as it would include the
> thumbnails..
Yes. That's my point. Dropping the tables isn't practical on a nightly
basis. I currently have separated databases and the "main" database
backup is 1.5 MB compressed but the thumbnails database is 650 MB
compressed.
>
>
> The performance of MySQL doesn't really come into it. You can in theory
> partition different databases into different locations/disks etc. and
> that might be of interest to some but it would be a pretty special
> use case.
>
> I think that the correct default would be to use a common name for all
> three but allow separate names if required.
>
>
> I think teh default should be one database also.
>
> I guess, having the possibility to separate the databases would
> introduce much more work right? I am not sure.. not a developer.. i
> only know some about infrastructure .
You can already separate them and I would like to see that capability
remain if possible.
Regards
Richard
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> Digikam-users at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
More information about the Digikam-users
mailing list