[Digikam-users] patch to bootstrap.macports for parallel installations

Phil philtuckey at free.fr
Thu May 29 07:54:36 BST 2014


Hi Gilles

To facilitate parallel installations on OSX I suggest the following 
modification to bootstrap.macports:

--- bootstrap.macports-orig	2014-05-26 00:19:16.000000000 +0200
+++ bootstrap.macports	2014-05-29 08:41:50.000000000 +0200
@@ -21,6 +21,9 @@
  INSTALL_PREFIX=$1
  if [ "$INSTALL_PREFIX" = "" ]; then
          INSTALL_PREFIX=/opt/local
+	BUNDLE_INSTALL_DIR=/Applications/MacPorts/KDE4
+else
+	BUNDLE_INSTALL_DIR=${INSTALL_PREFIX}/Applications/MacPorts/KDE4
  fi

  BUILD_TYPE=$2
@@ -56,7 +59,7 @@
        -DCMAKE_INSTALL_NAME_DIR=/opt/local/lib \
        -DCMAKE_SYSTEM_PREFIX_PATH="/opt/local;/usr" \
 
-DCMAKE_MODULE_PATH="/opt/local/share/cmake-2.8/Modules;/opt/local/share/cmake/modules" 
\
-      -DBUNDLE_INSTALL_DIR=/Applications/MacPorts/KDE4 \
+      -DBUNDLE_INSTALL_DIR=${BUNDLE_INSTALL_DIR} \
        -DQT_QT_INCLUDE_DIR=/opt/local/include \
        -DQT_LIBRARY_DIR=/opt/local/lib \
        -DQT_QMAKE_EXECUTABLE=/opt/local/bin/qmake \


On 25/05/14 08:54, Gilles Caulier wrote:
> Hum, no idea anymore...
>
> If i understand, your 4.0.0 come from a dedicated packaging. Perhaps
> it's compiled with debug symbols, which can introduce some time
> latency at editor core and prevent some di-synchronization... Here as
> developer it's compiled like this...
>
> Why not to compile and install current code yourself ? The advantage
> is to use last changes/fix that you can try in live following my work.
>
> It can be done in parallel of official release (3.5.0). Look here for details :
>
> https://projects.kde.org/projects/extragear/graphics/digikam/digikam-software-compilation/repository/revisions/master/entry/README.LOCAL
>
> Gilles Caulier
>
> 2014-05-24 16:24 GMT+02:00 Anders Stedtlund <falolaf at gmail.com>:
>> I have tested with and without color management with the same result
>>
>>
>> 2014-05-24 13:29 GMT+02:00 Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles at gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> 2014-05-24 13:03 GMT+02:00 Anders Stedtlund <falolaf at gmail.com>:
>>>> 2014-05-24 12:43 GMT+02:00 Anders Lund <anders at alweb.dk>:
>>>>
>>>>> On Lørdag den 24. maj 2014 12:30:33, Gilles Caulier wrote:
>>>>>> 2014-05-24 12:17 GMT+02:00 Anders Lund <anders at alweb.dk>:
>>>>>>> On Lørdag den 24. maj 2014 12:15:10, Gilles Caulier wrote:
>>>>>>>> There is an important setup to check on your computer.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I see dysfunction and time latency introduced in digiKam when you
>>>>>>>> use
>>>>>>>> exotic widget style with KDE application
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A lots of widget styles are bugous. Here i always used Oxygen
>>>>>>>> style
>>>>>>>> which is official and default used by KDE. And here all is fine.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For ex, Non KDE distro (as Ubuntu) do not use Oxygen widget style.
>>>>>>>> This can introduce problems...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I use QtCurve, is that exotic?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If i remember well, yes. I see some words about in KDE mailing list.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Change widget style  from digiKam config panel through MISC Settings
>>>>>> page...
>>>>>
>>>>> This has no appearent effect on the missizing of the previews, or the
>>>>> stickyness of them, nor on the intepretation of the radius parameter in
>>>>> the
>>>>> unsharp mask tool - it just makes digikam look like I use oxygen...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Switching style has no effect in my setup!
>>>>
>>>> In my case it's even sometimes not working to push "Try", nothing
>>>> happens.
>>>>
>>>> And I have tested even more now and it always problems with images that
>>>> has
>>>> been resized and it always works on images with original size.
>>>>
>>>> Should I try with KDE 4.13 instead? What QT is preferred?
>>>
>>> This has no incidence here
>>>
>>> Do you use Color Management ?
>>>
>>> Gilles Caulier
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>> Digikam-users at kde.org
>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Digikam-users mailing list
>> Digikam-users at kde.org
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> Digikam-users at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>



More information about the Digikam-users mailing list