[Digikam-users] Aw

Tue May 27 09:12:15 BST 2014

Hi Gilles!

I sent you a message with a link to an image!

BTW, I have tested with a precompiled digiKam and it behaves the same for
me.

Anyone out there on openSUSE 13.1 with a working digiKam 4.0.0?

/Anders

2014-05-27 9:36 GMT+02:00 Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles at gmail.com>:

> Just to be sure, can you share with me some image samples please ?
>
> Gilles Caulier
>
> 2014-05-27 9:33 GMT+02:00 Anders Stedtlund <falolaf at gmail.com>:
> > I have built again with debugfull and I see this from time to time when
> > doing refocus:
> > digikam(6599)/digikam (core) Digikam::EditorToolThreaded::slotPreview:
> > Preview  "Sharpen"  started...
> > digikam(6599)/digikam (core)
> > Digikam::EditorToolThreaded::slotFilterFinished: Preview  "Sharpen"
> > failed...
> > digikam(6599)/digikam (core) Digikam::DImgThreadedFilter::startFilter:
> > "Refocus" ::No valid image data !!! ...
> >
> > But not always!
> >
> > /Anders
> >
> >
> > 2014-05-25 12:00 GMT+02:00 Anders Stedtlund <falolaf at gmail.com>:
> >
> >> I will try that!
> >>
> >> Btw, I have seen a printout when exiting something about a linked list.
> >> And when I see that I have to kill digikam with ctrl-c.
> >>
> >> /Anders S
> >>
> >> Den 25 maj 2014 11:54 skrev "Gilles Caulier" <caulier.gilles at gmail.com
> >:
> >>
> >>> Clean up all and replace -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=release by
> >>> -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=debugfull
> >>>
> >>> This is what i use here. The advantage when a crash appear is to have
> >>> a suitable backtrace as well...
> >>>
> >>> Gilles Caulier
> >>>
> >>> 2014-05-25 11:50 GMT+02:00 Anders Stedtlund <falolaf at gmail.com>:
> >>> > In my case I have built it myself. I do like this (form root of
> >>> > unpacked
> >>> > digikam-4.0.0.tar.bz2):
> >>> > cmake -DDIGIKAMSC_USE_PRIVATE_KDEGRAPHICS=on
> -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=release
> >>> > -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=<install path> -DENABLE_LCMS2=on
> >>> > -DDIGIKAMSC_COMPILE_DOC=on -DDIGIKAMSC_CHECKOUT_PO=off -Wno-dev .
> >>> >
> >>> > make -j 4
> >>> >
> >>> > make install
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > This have worked for all the latest releases.
> >>> >
> >>> > /Anders S
> >>> >
> >>> > 2014-05-25 8:54 GMT+02:00 Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles at gmail.com>:
> >>> >
> >>> >> Hum, no idea anymore...
> >>> >>
> >>> >> If i understand, your 4.0.0 come from a dedicated packaging. Perhaps
> >>> >> it's compiled with debug symbols, which can introduce some time
> >>> >> latency at editor core and prevent some di-synchronization... Here
> as
> >>> >> developer it's compiled like this...
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Why not to compile and install current code yourself ? The advantage
> >>> >> is to use last changes/fix that you can try in live following my
> work.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> It can be done in parallel of official release (3.5.0). Look here
> for
> >>> >> details :
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> https://projects.kde.org/projects/extragear/graphics/digikam/digikam-software-compilation/repository/revisions/master/entry/README.LOCAL
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Gilles Caulier
> >>> >>
> >>> >> 2014-05-24 16:24 GMT+02:00 Anders Stedtlund <falolaf at gmail.com>:
> >>> >> > I have tested with and without color management with the same
> result
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > 2014-05-24 13:29 GMT+02:00 Gilles Caulier
> >>> >> > <caulier.gilles at gmail.com>:
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> 2014-05-24 13:03 GMT+02:00 Anders Stedtlund <falolaf at gmail.com>:
> >>> >> >> > 2014-05-24 12:43 GMT+02:00 Anders Lund <anders at alweb.dk>:
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> On Lørdag den 24. maj 2014 12:30:33, Gilles Caulier wrote:
> >>> >> >> >> > 2014-05-24 12:17 GMT+02:00 Anders Lund <anders at alweb.dk>:
> >>> >> >> >> > > On Lørdag den 24. maj 2014 12:15:10, Gilles Caulier wrote:
> >>> >> >> >> > >> There is an important setup to check on your computer.
> >>> >> >> >> > >>
> >>> >> >> >> > >> I see dysfunction and time latency introduced in digiKam
> >>> >> >> >> > >> when
> >>> >> >> >> > >> you
> >>> >> >> >> > >> use
> >>> >> >> >> > >> exotic widget style with KDE application
> >>> >> >> >> > >>
> >>> >> >> >> > >> A lots of widget styles are bugous. Here i always used
> >>> >> >> >> > >> Oxygen
> >>> >> >> >> > >> style
> >>> >> >> >> > >> which is official and default used by KDE. And here all
> is
> >>> >> >> >> > >> fine.
> >>> >> >> >> > >>
> >>> >> >> >> > >> For ex, Non KDE distro (as Ubuntu) do not use Oxygen
> widget
> >>> >> >> >> > >> style.
> >>> >> >> >> > >> This can introduce problems...
> >>> >> >> >> > >
> >>> >> >> >> > > I use QtCurve, is that exotic?
> >>> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> > If i remember well, yes. I see some words about in KDE
> mailing
> >>> >> >> >> > list.
> >>> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> > Change widget style  from digiKam config panel through MISC
> >>> >> >> >> > Settings
> >>> >> >> >> > page...
> >>> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> This has no appearent effect on the missizing of the previews,
> >>> >> >> >> or
> >>> >> >> >> the
> >>> >> >> >> stickyness of them, nor on the intepretation of the radius
> >>> >> >> >> parameter
> >>> >> >> >> in
> >>> >> >> >> the
> >>> >> >> >> unsharp mask tool - it just makes digikam look like I use
> >>> >> >> >> oxygen...
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> > Switching style has no effect in my setup!
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> > In my case it's even sometimes not working to push "Try",
> nothing
> >>> >> >> > happens.
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> > And I have tested even more now and it always problems with
> >>> >> >> > images
> >>> >> >> > that
> >>> >> >> > has
> >>> >> >> > been resized and it always works on images with original size.
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> > Should I try with KDE 4.13 instead? What QT is preferred?
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> This has no incidence here
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> Do you use Color Management ?
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> Gilles Caulier
> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >>> >> >> Digikam-users mailing list
> >>> >> >> Digikam-users at kde.org
> >>> >> >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > _______________________________________________
> >>> >> > Digikam-users mailing list
> >>> >> > Digikam-users at kde.org
> >>> >> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> _______________________________________________
> >>> >> Digikam-users mailing list
> >>> >> Digikam-users at kde.org
> >>> >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > _______________________________________________
> >>> > Digikam-users mailing list
> >>> > Digikam-users at kde.org
> >>> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
> >>> >
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Digikam-users mailing list
> >>> Digikam-users at kde.org
> >>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Digikam-users mailing list
> > Digikam-users at kde.org
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> Digikam-users at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20140527/f523e90b/attachment.html>