[Digikam-users] Aw
Gilles Caulier
caulier.gilles at gmail.com
Tue May 27 08:36:52 BST 2014
Just to be sure, can you share with me some image samples please ?
Gilles Caulier
2014-05-27 9:33 GMT+02:00 Anders Stedtlund <falolaf at gmail.com>:
> I have built again with debugfull and I see this from time to time when
> doing refocus:
> digikam(6599)/digikam (core) Digikam::EditorToolThreaded::slotPreview:
> Preview "Sharpen" started...
> digikam(6599)/digikam (core)
> Digikam::EditorToolThreaded::slotFilterFinished: Preview "Sharpen"
> failed...
> digikam(6599)/digikam (core) Digikam::DImgThreadedFilter::startFilter:
> "Refocus" ::No valid image data !!! ...
>
> But not always!
>
> /Anders
>
>
> 2014-05-25 12:00 GMT+02:00 Anders Stedtlund <falolaf at gmail.com>:
>
>> I will try that!
>>
>> Btw, I have seen a printout when exiting something about a linked list.
>> And when I see that I have to kill digikam with ctrl-c.
>>
>> /Anders S
>>
>> Den 25 maj 2014 11:54 skrev "Gilles Caulier" <caulier.gilles at gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Clean up all and replace -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=release by
>>> -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=debugfull
>>>
>>> This is what i use here. The advantage when a crash appear is to have
>>> a suitable backtrace as well...
>>>
>>> Gilles Caulier
>>>
>>> 2014-05-25 11:50 GMT+02:00 Anders Stedtlund <falolaf at gmail.com>:
>>> > In my case I have built it myself. I do like this (form root of
>>> > unpacked
>>> > digikam-4.0.0.tar.bz2):
>>> > cmake -DDIGIKAMSC_USE_PRIVATE_KDEGRAPHICS=on -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=release
>>> > -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=<install path> -DENABLE_LCMS2=on
>>> > -DDIGIKAMSC_COMPILE_DOC=on -DDIGIKAMSC_CHECKOUT_PO=off -Wno-dev .
>>> >
>>> > make -j 4
>>> >
>>> > make install
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > This have worked for all the latest releases.
>>> >
>>> > /Anders S
>>> >
>>> > 2014-05-25 8:54 GMT+02:00 Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles at gmail.com>:
>>> >
>>> >> Hum, no idea anymore...
>>> >>
>>> >> If i understand, your 4.0.0 come from a dedicated packaging. Perhaps
>>> >> it's compiled with debug symbols, which can introduce some time
>>> >> latency at editor core and prevent some di-synchronization... Here as
>>> >> developer it's compiled like this...
>>> >>
>>> >> Why not to compile and install current code yourself ? The advantage
>>> >> is to use last changes/fix that you can try in live following my work.
>>> >>
>>> >> It can be done in parallel of official release (3.5.0). Look here for
>>> >> details :
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> https://projects.kde.org/projects/extragear/graphics/digikam/digikam-software-compilation/repository/revisions/master/entry/README.LOCAL
>>> >>
>>> >> Gilles Caulier
>>> >>
>>> >> 2014-05-24 16:24 GMT+02:00 Anders Stedtlund <falolaf at gmail.com>:
>>> >> > I have tested with and without color management with the same result
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > 2014-05-24 13:29 GMT+02:00 Gilles Caulier
>>> >> > <caulier.gilles at gmail.com>:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> 2014-05-24 13:03 GMT+02:00 Anders Stedtlund <falolaf at gmail.com>:
>>> >> >> > 2014-05-24 12:43 GMT+02:00 Anders Lund <anders at alweb.dk>:
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >> On Lørdag den 24. maj 2014 12:30:33, Gilles Caulier wrote:
>>> >> >> >> > 2014-05-24 12:17 GMT+02:00 Anders Lund <anders at alweb.dk>:
>>> >> >> >> > > On Lørdag den 24. maj 2014 12:15:10, Gilles Caulier wrote:
>>> >> >> >> > >> There is an important setup to check on your computer.
>>> >> >> >> > >>
>>> >> >> >> > >> I see dysfunction and time latency introduced in digiKam
>>> >> >> >> > >> when
>>> >> >> >> > >> you
>>> >> >> >> > >> use
>>> >> >> >> > >> exotic widget style with KDE application
>>> >> >> >> > >>
>>> >> >> >> > >> A lots of widget styles are bugous. Here i always used
>>> >> >> >> > >> Oxygen
>>> >> >> >> > >> style
>>> >> >> >> > >> which is official and default used by KDE. And here all is
>>> >> >> >> > >> fine.
>>> >> >> >> > >>
>>> >> >> >> > >> For ex, Non KDE distro (as Ubuntu) do not use Oxygen widget
>>> >> >> >> > >> style.
>>> >> >> >> > >> This can introduce problems...
>>> >> >> >> > >
>>> >> >> >> > > I use QtCurve, is that exotic?
>>> >> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >> > If i remember well, yes. I see some words about in KDE mailing
>>> >> >> >> > list.
>>> >> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >> > Change widget style from digiKam config panel through MISC
>>> >> >> >> > Settings
>>> >> >> >> > page...
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> This has no appearent effect on the missizing of the previews,
>>> >> >> >> or
>>> >> >> >> the
>>> >> >> >> stickyness of them, nor on the intepretation of the radius
>>> >> >> >> parameter
>>> >> >> >> in
>>> >> >> >> the
>>> >> >> >> unsharp mask tool - it just makes digikam look like I use
>>> >> >> >> oxygen...
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > Switching style has no effect in my setup!
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > In my case it's even sometimes not working to push "Try", nothing
>>> >> >> > happens.
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > And I have tested even more now and it always problems with
>>> >> >> > images
>>> >> >> > that
>>> >> >> > has
>>> >> >> > been resized and it always works on images with original size.
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > Should I try with KDE 4.13 instead? What QT is preferred?
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> This has no incidence here
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Do you use Color Management ?
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Gilles Caulier
>>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> >> Digikam-users mailing list
>>> >> >> Digikam-users at kde.org
>>> >> >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > _______________________________________________
>>> >> > Digikam-users mailing list
>>> >> > Digikam-users at kde.org
>>> >> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>> >> >
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> Digikam-users mailing list
>>> >> Digikam-users at kde.org
>>> >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Digikam-users mailing list
>>> > Digikam-users at kde.org
>>> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>> >
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>> Digikam-users at kde.org
>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> Digikam-users at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
More information about the Digikam-users
mailing list