[Digikam-users] Aw

[Anders Stedtlund]

In my case I have built it myself. I do like this (form root of unpacked
digikam-4.0.0.tar.bz2):
cmake -DDIGIKAMSC_USE_PRIVATE_KDEGRAPHICS=on -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=release
-DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=<install path> -DENABLE_LCMS2=on
-DDIGIKAMSC_COMPILE_DOC=on -DDIGIKAMSC_CHECKOUT_PO=off -Wno-dev .

make -j 4

make install


This have worked for all the latest releases.

/Anders S

2014-05-25 8:54 GMT+02:00 Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles at gmail.com>:

> Hum, no idea anymore...
>
> If i understand, your 4.0.0 come from a dedicated packaging. Perhaps
> it's compiled with debug symbols, which can introduce some time
> latency at editor core and prevent some di-synchronization... Here as
> developer it's compiled like this...
>
> Why not to compile and install current code yourself ? The advantage
> is to use last changes/fix that you can try in live following my work.
>
> It can be done in parallel of official release (3.5.0). Look here for
> details :
>
>
> https://projects.kde.org/projects/extragear/graphics/digikam/digikam-software-compilation/repository/revisions/master/entry/README.LOCAL
>
> Gilles Caulier
>
> 2014-05-24 16:24 GMT+02:00 Anders Stedtlund <falolaf at gmail.com>:
> > I have tested with and without color management with the same result
> >
> >
> > 2014-05-24 13:29 GMT+02:00 Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles at gmail.com>:
> >>
> >> 2014-05-24 13:03 GMT+02:00 Anders Stedtlund <falolaf at gmail.com>:
> >> > 2014-05-24 12:43 GMT+02:00 Anders Lund <anders at alweb.dk>:
> >> >
> >> >> On Lørdag den 24. maj 2014 12:30:33, Gilles Caulier wrote:
> >> >> > 2014-05-24 12:17 GMT+02:00 Anders Lund <anders at alweb.dk>:
> >> >> > > On Lørdag den 24. maj 2014 12:15:10, Gilles Caulier wrote:
> >> >> > >> There is an important setup to check on your computer.
> >> >> > >>
> >> >> > >> I see dysfunction and time latency introduced in digiKam when
> you
> >> >> > >> use
> >> >> > >> exotic widget style with KDE application
> >> >> > >>
> >> >> > >> A lots of widget styles are bugous. Here i always used Oxygen
> >> >> > >> style
> >> >> > >> which is official and default used by KDE. And here all is fine.
> >> >> > >>
> >> >> > >> For ex, Non KDE distro (as Ubuntu) do not use Oxygen widget
> style.
> >> >> > >> This can introduce problems...
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > I use QtCurve, is that exotic?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > If i remember well, yes. I see some words about in KDE mailing
> list.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Change widget style  from digiKam config panel through MISC
> Settings
> >> >> > page...
> >> >>
> >> >> This has no appearent effect on the missizing of the previews, or the
> >> >> stickyness of them, nor on the intepretation of the radius parameter
> in
> >> >> the
> >> >> unsharp mask tool - it just makes digikam look like I use oxygen...
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Switching style has no effect in my setup!
> >> >
> >> > In my case it's even sometimes not working to push "Try", nothing
> >> > happens.
> >> >
> >> > And I have tested even more now and it always problems with images
> that
> >> > has
> >> > been resized and it always works on images with original size.
> >> >
> >> > Should I try with KDE 4.13 instead? What QT is preferred?
> >>
> >> This has no incidence here
> >>
> >> Do you use Color Management ?
> >>
> >> Gilles Caulier
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Digikam-users mailing list
> >> Digikam-users at kde.org
> >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Digikam-users mailing list
> > Digikam-users at kde.org
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> Digikam-users at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20140525/e3aa45a5/attachment.html>