[Digikam-users] A modern auto-fix?

Carl McGrath cmcgrath5035 at comcast.net
Sun May 11 12:20:20 BST 2014


OK, so I read your referenced bug report - you have been busy!

Will all these enhanced tools be multi-thread operation with 4.0.0, or a 
future 4.x.y?
I guess I would expect only minor fixes between 4.0.0-rc and 4.0.0

Anyway, thanks for your continued efforts - digikam is a great toolset.


On 05/10/2014 04:52 PM, Gilles Caulier wrote:
> 2014-05-10 22:22 GMT+02:00 Carl McGrath <cmcgrath5035 at comcast.net>:
>> Gilles
>> I am running 4.0.0-rc on openSUSE, LC does seem faster.
>> In System Monitor, when running LC,  I see Digikam using up to 30% of CPU,
>> which on a quad-core means a bit more than one full core.
>>
>> Is there any config that needs to be done/enabled, or does Digikam just take
>> what it can get?
> no. Your implementation (4.0.0-RC) use just single separated thread.
>
> On current implementation, this scan all cores available on the system
> (here i7 CPU = 8 cores) and divide all operations parallelizable. Each
> core will run a parallelized part.
>
> Gain depend of complexity of computation to process : between 40% to
> 60% of time is saved.
>
> Gilles Caulier
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> Digikam-users at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>




More information about the Digikam-users mailing list