[Digikam-users] patch to bootstrap.macports for parallel installations

[Gilles Caulier]

Patch applied to git/master...

Gilles

2014-05-29 8:54 GMT+02:00 Phil <philtuckey at free.fr>:
> Hi Gilles
>
> To facilitate parallel installations on OSX I suggest the following
> modification to bootstrap.macports:
>
> --- bootstrap.macports-orig     2014-05-26 00:19:16.000000000 +0200
> +++ bootstrap.macports  2014-05-29 08:41:50.000000000 +0200
> @@ -21,6 +21,9 @@
>  INSTALL_PREFIX=$1
>  if [ "$INSTALL_PREFIX" = "" ]; then
>          INSTALL_PREFIX=/opt/local
> +       BUNDLE_INSTALL_DIR=/Applications/MacPorts/KDE4
> +else
> +       BUNDLE_INSTALL_DIR=${INSTALL_PREFIX}/Applications/MacPorts/KDE4
>  fi
>
>  BUILD_TYPE=$2
> @@ -56,7 +59,7 @@
>        -DCMAKE_INSTALL_NAME_DIR=/opt/local/lib \
>        -DCMAKE_SYSTEM_PREFIX_PATH="/opt/local;/usr" \
>
> -DCMAKE_MODULE_PATH="/opt/local/share/cmake-2.8/Modules;/opt/local/share/cmake/modules"
> \
> -      -DBUNDLE_INSTALL_DIR=/Applications/MacPorts/KDE4 \
> +      -DBUNDLE_INSTALL_DIR=${BUNDLE_INSTALL_DIR} \
>        -DQT_QT_INCLUDE_DIR=/opt/local/include \
>        -DQT_LIBRARY_DIR=/opt/local/lib \
>        -DQT_QMAKE_EXECUTABLE=/opt/local/bin/qmake \
>
>
> On 25/05/14 08:54, Gilles Caulier wrote:
>>
>> Hum, no idea anymore...
>>
>> If i understand, your 4.0.0 come from a dedicated packaging. Perhaps
>> it's compiled with debug symbols, which can introduce some time
>> latency at editor core and prevent some di-synchronization... Here as
>> developer it's compiled like this...
>>
>> Why not to compile and install current code yourself ? The advantage
>> is to use last changes/fix that you can try in live following my work.
>>
>> It can be done in parallel of official release (3.5.0). Look here for
>> details :
>>
>>
>> https://projects.kde.org/projects/extragear/graphics/digikam/digikam-software-compilation/repository/revisions/master/entry/README.LOCAL
>>
>> Gilles Caulier
>>
>> 2014-05-24 16:24 GMT+02:00 Anders Stedtlund <falolaf at gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> I have tested with and without color management with the same result
>>>
>>>
>>> 2014-05-24 13:29 GMT+02:00 Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles at gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2014-05-24 13:03 GMT+02:00 Anders Stedtlund <falolaf at gmail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>> 2014-05-24 12:43 GMT+02:00 Anders Lund <anders at alweb.dk>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Lørdag den 24. maj 2014 12:30:33, Gilles Caulier wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2014-05-24 12:17 GMT+02:00 Anders Lund <anders at alweb.dk>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Lørdag den 24. maj 2014 12:15:10, Gilles Caulier wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There is an important setup to check on your computer.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I see dysfunction and time latency introduced in digiKam when you
>>>>>>>>> use
>>>>>>>>> exotic widget style with KDE application
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> A lots of widget styles are bugous. Here i always used Oxygen
>>>>>>>>> style
>>>>>>>>> which is official and default used by KDE. And here all is fine.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> For ex, Non KDE distro (as Ubuntu) do not use Oxygen widget style.
>>>>>>>>> This can introduce problems...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I use QtCurve, is that exotic?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If i remember well, yes. I see some words about in KDE mailing list.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Change widget style  from digiKam config panel through MISC Settings
>>>>>>> page...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This has no appearent effect on the missizing of the previews, or the
>>>>>> stickyness of them, nor on the intepretation of the radius parameter
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> unsharp mask tool - it just makes digikam look like I use oxygen...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Switching style has no effect in my setup!
>>>>>
>>>>> In my case it's even sometimes not working to push "Try", nothing
>>>>> happens.
>>>>>
>>>>> And I have tested even more now and it always problems with images that
>>>>> has
>>>>> been resized and it always works on images with original size.
>>>>>
>>>>> Should I try with KDE 4.13 instead? What QT is preferred?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This has no incidence here
>>>>
>>>> Do you use Color Management ?
>>>>
>>>> Gilles Caulier
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>>> Digikam-users at kde.org
>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>> Digikam-users at kde.org
>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Digikam-users mailing list
>> Digikam-users at kde.org
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> Digikam-users at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users