[Digikam-users] File weight different in Digikam than in other file management tools

[Marie-Noëlle Augendre]

2014/1/21 Jean-François Rabasse <jf at e-artefact.eu>

>
> Hello,
>
>
Thanks for your input.

>
> But this doesn't matter.
> Build you file using the smallest value, here 300000. That way, you'll
> be sure your upload won't be rejected, and for your image it will change
> nothing.
> (Typically for a 1024 pixels JPEG, you'll have to tweak quality around
> 87%, 90%, values.
> If with, e.g. 88% quality, you get a file size of 301000 bytes, go done
> to 87% quality, you'll get something around 290000 bytes and the two
> images will be visually identical. With a difference of 1%, you won't
> be able, with an images viewer, to guess which one is which one.)
>

Except that for this particuliar picture I had to go down to 72% quality,
and at that level, 1% could make a real difference, and moreover as it was
a night picture that could real bad when it's compressed too much.

Marie-Noëlle

-- 
<http://marie-noelle-augendre.com/photos/>
Retrouvez mon portfolio et mes activités dans ma galerie
personnelle<http://marie-noelle-augendre.com/photos/>,
mes reportages sur Jingoo <http://www.jingoo.com/mnaugendre/>
Et bien sûr la page Photographe en
Cévennes<http://www.facebook.com/PhotographeEnCevennes>sur FB, et mon
compte
Twitter <http://twitter.com/MNAugendre>.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20140121/0024847f/attachment.html>