[Digikam-users] digikam 4.1 bugs

[Gilles Caulier]

Note : i tried to compile in "release" mode where all debugs symbols
are dropped. digiKam is more faster. Problem is not reproducible.

Gilles Caulier



2014-08-05 18:02 GMT+02:00 Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles at gmail.com>:
> Hi
>
> I'm back to this entry.
>
> I recompiled whole digiKam 4.2.0 in 'release with debug symbol'. It's
> usually used to package binary.
>
> The problem is not reproducible here.
>
> Can you :
>
> 1/ Look in Help/About dialog. There is a "Build Date" info where
> target compilation option is printed. Which one do you have (mine is
> "relwithdebinfo")
>
> 2/ Use a cellular and record a video sequence from screen with all
> actions done to reproduce the problem
>
> 3/ Share files used to reproduce the problem in editor.
>
> Gilles Caulier
>
> 2014-07-28 17:34 GMT+02:00 Daniel Bauer <linux at daniel-bauer.com>:
>>
>>
>> Am 28.07.2014 14:42, schrieb Anders Lund:
>>
>>> On Mandag den 28. juli 2014 12:39:00, Wilkins, Vern W wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I haven't followed the thread completely but my question is whether the
>>>> preview bug has been satisfactorily fixed in 4.1.  I gave up on using 4.x
>>>> because of this problem.  No offense intended but this is a 'major' bug
>>>> to
>>>> have in a stable release and still in an update to the stable release.
>>>> For
>>>> me it made the application more or less unusable.
>>>
>>>
>>> The preview problems are about the same in 4.1.
>>>
>>>> I had the problem with 4.0 on Gentoo Linux, compiling against the latest
>>>> unstable kde and opencv libraries, which included opencv 2.4.9.  I still
>>>> had the problem after I built my own package for 4.1 and built against
>>>> the
>>>> same libraries.
>>>>
>>>> On Fedora I had the same problem with Digikam 4.0.  I used another
>>>> repository to install 4.1 and the problem still persists.  Fedora
>>>> developers are trying to get opencv 2.9 into the repository and
>>>> indicating
>>>> this will fix the problem.  I'm not sure I've really seen that explained
>>>> here.  Is this really a fix for the preview problem?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Vern
>>
>>
>> Just to add a "me too" for opensuse 12.3 rpm.
>>
>> I had to go back to 3.2 (the last rpm I found) because 4.x was not usable
>> for me...
>>
>> Daniel
>> --
>> Daniel Bauer photographer Basel Barcelona
>> professional photography: http://www.daniel-bauer.com
>> google+: https://plus.google.com/109534388657020287386
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Digikam-users mailing list
>> Digikam-users at kde.org
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users