[Digikam-users] database troubles
Jean-François Rabasse
jean-francois.rabasse at wanadoo.fr
Tue Jan 29 18:33:23 GMT 2013
Just my personal comment/opinion
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Anders Lund wrote:
> Since it became possible, I have digikam configured to add all data to the
> image, either embedded or (for RAW files) in "sidecar" files.
>
> However, moving from pc to pc over the years have worked fine. I unpack a
> backup of the digikam image directory on the new device, and add that to the
> digikam collections. Job done.
I totaly agree with Anders.
All my metadata are into the images, XMP section, for several reasons :
1. In the past I happened to loose metadata through database losses via
Digikam versions changes. I said ito myself « never more »
2. As Anders does, I can restore all on a different machine just by
rescanning folders from a backup and rereading metadata from images.
Job done, yes :-)
3. Cf. another discussion thread at the moment, « remote digikam acces to
server » the problem of collections recognized or not by DK, because
the UUID of a drive has changed is solved per se.
New collection ? ('cause of new UUID), Ok, go on, scan and read data
from images.
4. I don't want to rely on such or such application program, Digikam or
other, because metadata requires work and I want to keep this work
as long as I keep the images. (10 years, 20 years, more ?)
5. I use other programs that access images metadata, that can handle
XMP sections, but are not aware of DK database schemas.
(Probably, an important use is when building web albums from images.
To be able to index pages, one need to add meta keywords in HTML
headers and, to do this, some standard fields as Xmp.DC.subject are
required, not a Digikam DB.)
The inconvenients with storing matedata into images ?
Yes, it's true that DK has more information that can be stored in images
metadata.
My personal choice was to forget that, because the 5 above reasons are
really more important and being able to restore metadata from an images
directories tree sounds a major issue to me.
Regards,
Jean-François
More information about the Digikam-users
mailing list