[Digikam-users] Are the grouping issues solved?

[Ozzy]

Exciting next two weeks! All the best.

And as always Thank you Gilles, Marcel, et al. for all the amazing work.

Oz.
On Mar 24, 2012 6:53 AM, "Marie-Noëlle Augendre" <mnaugendre at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks for your answer, Gilles.
>
> Unfortunately, I don't think I'll have time to test during the two next
> weeks (on a shooting trip next week, then getting ready for my 1st
> exhibition the week after).
> If it is still in beta stage after that, I'll give it a try.
>
> Marie-Noëlle
>
> 2012/3/24 Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles at gmail.com>
>
>> Marcel has recently fixed some issue about in current implement from
>> git/master. He also work a lots to have a better XMP sidecar support...
>>
>> Definitivly, 2.6.0 will be better for you. Currently we are on beta
>> stage. Don not use it in production, but i recommend you to test it on a
>> dedicated test repository, and to report problem to Marcel directly.
>>
>> About me, i currently manage a lots of students to implement new features
>> and tools, as Video slideshow, video metadata support (through Exiv2),
>> Clone tool, etc... Marcel also has some students, about DLNA support, Face
>> Recognition, Clone tool, etc...
>>
>> Best
>>
>> Gilles Caulier
>>
>> 2012/3/24 Marie-Noëlle Augendre <mnaugendre at gmail.com>
>>
>>> A couple of months ago, I had real problems with the grouping function:
>>> some pictures completely disappeared from Digikam, and it was impossible
>>> even to reimport them as Digikam persists to "hide" them. I eventually
>>> deleted the DB and rebuild it from scratch, as there seems to be no other
>>> way to "recover" the lost pictures.
>>> The problem seemed to be related with some wrong link between pictures
>>> recorded in the DB, or whatever...
>>>
>>> I would like very much to use the grouping function as I often have
>>> several versions of the same picture (1 RAW, several TIFF and more JPEG)
>>> and it will make the searching/browsing/tagging/etc. much easier; but I
>>> wouln't like to "loose" pictures as before, and to be obliged to do another
>>> "rough cleaning" of the database.
>>>
>>> Have things improved on the matter? I seem to remember the team has
>>> worked on the DB in their last coding sprint.
>>>
>>> Thanks for your answers,
>>> Marie-Noëlle
>>>
>>> --
>>> <http://www.marie-noelle-augendre.com/photos/>
>>>
>>> Mes dernières photos sont dans ma galerie<http://www.marie-noelle-augendre.com/photos/>
>>> .
>>> Retrouvez-moi aussi sur mon blog <http://www.mnaugendre.com/>.
>>> Et parcourez les Cévennes à ma façon avec Cévennes Plurielles<http://www.cevennes-plurielles.com/>,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>> Digikam-users at kde.org
>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Digikam-users mailing list
>> Digikam-users at kde.org
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> <http://www.marie-noelle-augendre.com/photos/>
>
> Mes dernières photos sont dans ma galerie<http://www.marie-noelle-augendre.com/photos/>
> .
> Retrouvez-moi aussi sur mon blog <http://www.mnaugendre.com/>.
> Et parcourez les Cévennes à ma façon avec Cévennes Plurielles<http://www.cevennes-plurielles.com/>,
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> Digikam-users at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20120324/e2488f9e/attachment.html>