[Digikam-users] Re : Wishes for future versions

[Ozzy]

Being able to properly read tooltips!
 On Jan 19, 2012 1:56 PM, "todd rme" <toddrme2178 at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Paulux <nvlplx at yahoo.fr> wrote:
> > Not very smart, but I can make anything but :
> >
> > +999999999999999999999999999
> >
> > Clark
> >
> > ________________________________
> > De : Andrew Goodbody <ajg02 at elfringham.co.uk>
> > À : digikam-users at kde.org
> > Envoyé le : Samedi 14 Janvier 2012 19h34
> > Objet : Re: [Digikam-users] Wishes for future versions
> >
> > On 14/01/12 18:15, Remco iëtor wrote:
> >> I'll use the occasion to elaborate a bit about the why of some items.
> >> Ideally, I would like to be able to edit one image in the normal editor
> >> (starting from a raw file or any other format) and then apply the same
> >> treatment  for a series of other images. In order for that to work,
> tools
> >> need
> >> to be present in both the editor and the batch queue manager, and the
> >> tools
> >> need to accept the same set of parameters. (and ideally the same code,
> as
> >> far
> >> as possible, of course). With the versioning system in place, a lot of
> the
> >> required information is now available/stored somewhere. When we get the
> >> missing tools in the batch queue, we could use the versioning info to
> >> replay
> >> the used treatment on another file.
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Andrew
>
> If there is a single thing I would really love, it would be a reworked
> duplicate image interface.  It takes too many clicks to remove a
> duplicate image, making it infeasible to use for anything other than a
> very small number of pictures.
>
> You need to click the item in the list, then figure out which pictures
> you want you want to delete, then click those pictures , then click
> delete, then wait for the file to delete, and only after the deleting
> is done can you move onto the next picture.  It could easily take 20
> or 30 seconds per set, and if you have thousands of duplicates (easy
> if you are trying to merge pictures from two computers with lots of
> overlap but different metadata), that could easily be ten hours of
> tedious clicking.  This actually is exactly the case I am in right now
>
> Having a single browser for all duplicate pictures, for instance with
> each row being a duplicate set, and each column being a folder, would
> make it easy to remove duplicates from a particular folder easily and
> quickly.
>
> -Todd
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> Digikam-users at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20120122/29035327/attachment.html>