[Digikam-users] digiKam 2.1.0: Unsafe or not?

[Anders Stedtlund]

2011/9/12 Rinus Bakker <sleeplessregulus at gmail.com>:
> From the bug tread.
> ##############################
> ------ Comment #19 From Francesco Riosa 2011-09-11 21:44:38 (-) [reply]
> -------
>
> One more note:
> Since old database settings are not deleted, just copyed and splitted;
> users which didn't changed database settings in the meantime should be safe.
> #####################################
>
> Hope you have a few copies of your db around anyway.

I always make a snapshot of my db and images before an upgrade. I.e.
now I have a snapshot with suffix 2_0_0. Then the db is consistent
with the images.

/Anders

>
> Rinus
>
>
> 2011/9/12 Anders Stedtlund <falolaf at gmail.com>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just wanted to know if it is unsafe to use 2.1.0?
>>
>> I have built both digiKam 2.1.0 and kipi-plugins 2.1.0 myself. The
>> first time I launched digiKam there was an error saying something
>> about not beeing able to connect to the db. After that I haven't seen
>> that error again. I'm using SQLite.
>>
>> Can I still use 2.1.0 or should I revert to 2.0.0?
>>
>> My setup:
>> digiKam 2.1.0 (built by me)
>> kipi-plugins 2.1.0 (built by me)
>> KDE 4.7.0
>> openSUSE 11.4
>>
>> /Anders
>> _______________________________________________
>> Digikam-users mailing list
>> Digikam-users at kde.org
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> Digikam-users at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
>