[Digikam-users] digiKam 2.1.0: Unsafe or not?

[Rinus Bakker]

 From the bug tread.
##############################
------ *Comment #19 <https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281767#c19>
>From Francesco
Riosa <francesco+kde at pnpitalia.it> 2011-09-11 21:44:38*
(-)<https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281767#>[
reply <https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281767#add_comment>] -------

One more note:
Since old database settings are not deleted, just copyed and splitted;
users which didn't changed database settings in the meantime should be safe.
#####################################

Hope you have a few copies of your db around anyway.

Rinus



2011/9/12 Anders Stedtlund <falolaf at gmail.com>

> Hi,
>
> Just wanted to know if it is unsafe to use 2.1.0?
>
> I have built both digiKam 2.1.0 and kipi-plugins 2.1.0 myself. The
> first time I launched digiKam there was an error saying something
> about not beeing able to connect to the db. After that I haven't seen
> that error again. I'm using SQLite.
>
> Can I still use 2.1.0 or should I revert to 2.0.0?
>
> My setup:
> digiKam 2.1.0 (built by me)
> kipi-plugins 2.1.0 (built by me)
> KDE 4.7.0
> openSUSE 11.4
>
> /Anders
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> Digikam-users at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20110912/d7fb3c72/attachment.html>