[Digikam-users] Re: 1.9 or 2.0 compiled for Windows?

[sleepless]

I did try digikam on windows and it was a disaster, because I was fallen 
in love with digikam I have set up a dual boot system now and run dk 
2.0.0.4 on ubuntu 10.10.
If you say  "I keep reading of  bugs, even in the Linux versions" I 
might have contributed to that over the last few days. But actually I 
consider this version as pretty stable, I am doing heavy stuff with it 
and it does a great job, a crash sometimes but sofar never destructive, 
it seems that the data is well protected, after relaunch everyting  is 
just as it was before the crash. I feel safe with it.
Rinus

"
Op 25-3-2011 15:42, Paul Verizzo schreef:
> Giles, et. al., do I take it correctly that the Windows compilations
> have taken a back seat to getting 2.0 out?  I'm very, very grateful to
> have the 1.7 version but as you've noted (IIRC), it's pretty buggy.
> Still, I hold great hope for the future and I love so many things about it.
>
> I know NOTHING about programming and significantly less what KDE is
> about as some kind of a platform for digiKam.  Yet, I keep reading of
> bugs, even in the LInux versions, that seem to be due to KDE.  And all
> those kioslave.exe threads running when digiKam is in use really eats up
> my 3GB of RAM!
>
> My other favorite photo editing program is xnview.  It runs on every OS
> in use today and is stable and not a memory hog.  And, of course, no KDE.
>
> Thanks for listening.  I"d be interested in your thoughts.
>
> Paul
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> Digikam-users at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
>
> -----
> Geen virus gevonden in dit bericht.
> Gecontroleerd door AVG - www.avg.com
> Versie: 10.0.1204 / Virusdatabase: 1498/3527 - datum van uitgifte: 03/24/11
>
>