[Digikam-users] Digikam and tagging

[jim junk]

> From: kde at silicoids-world.de
> To: digikam-users at kde.org
> Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2010 11:40:42 +0200
> Subject: Re: [Digikam-users] Digikam and tagging
> 
> Hi
> 
> Am Saturday, 3. April 2010 schrieb jim junk:
> > To see the tags I've assigned to pictures I open the caption/tags panel on
> >  the right and at the bottom of the panel is a check box that if clicked
> >  will show the tags already assigned to the  image.  From there you can
> >  right click any image and add all the tags you want and watch them pile
> >  up.
> 
> Ever tried to tag images from a big birthday party with lots of different 
> peaople. This way it is a very slow process. 
> I know the "Tags already assigned" button but my problem is that like you I 
> use a tree/hierarchy and it is closed by default. So I select an image and 

I'm probably missing something but the right click tag image menu will open nested tags just by hovering over them with the mouse cursor.



> than have to click the whole tree open. 
> 
> > As for your second option there may be a way to do what you want, digikam
> >  is a beast and has lots of fundtionality that I'm not aware of.  Good
> >  luck.
> 
> I think I will do an feature request ...
> 
> Thanks,
> Andreas
> 
> 
> -- 
> My Public GPG Key: http://www.silicoids-world.de/gpg.asc
> Join Xing: http://www.xing.com/go/invite/7217885.c75a68
> 
> Which is worse: ignorance or apathy?  Who knows?  Who cares?
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> Digikam-users at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
The New Busy is not the too busy. Combine all your e-mail accounts with Hotmail.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=multiaccount&ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_4
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20100403/8f438292/attachment.html>