[Digikam-users] Shouldn't batch rename imply Sync with Database?

Alec Bau alecbau at gmail.com
Sun Jul 19 18:09:23 BST 2009


Gilles,

My dK is 0.10.0. I'm running it under Mandriva 2009.1 and KDE 4.2.4. I just
repeated mass rename starting dK from the console. Same result - I have to
do explicit sync with db to get album view updated with new names. During
rename stdout in console was repeating following:

Object::connect: No such signal KIO::PreviewJob::gotPreview(const
KFileItem*, const QPixmap&)
Object::connect:  (receiver name: 'RenameImagesBase')

Hope this helps.

On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles at gmail.com>wrote:

> I never see this problem. Which digiKAm version (print there
> Help/components Info dialog contents)
>
> What do you see in the console ?
>
> Gilles Caulier
>
> 2009/7/19 Alec Bau <alecbau at gmail.com>:
> > That's a question to developers I guess. I just found that after batch
> > rename album continues to misleadingly show old file names. Refresh
> doesn't
> > help. I poked around and found Album/Sync with Database which did the
> right
> > thing. Shouldn't db be transparently synced after mass operations?
> Otherwise
> > current behavior is rather confusing and counterintuitive.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >      Alec
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Digikam-users mailing list
> > Digikam-users at kde.org
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> Digikam-users at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20090719/59af8225/attachment.html>


More information about the Digikam-users mailing list