[Digikam-users] Shouldn't batch rename imply Sync with Database?

Alec Bau alecbau at gmail.com
Sat Jul 18 23:39:40 BST 2009

That's a question to developers I guess. I just found that after batch
rename album continues to misleadingly show old file names. Refresh doesn't
help. I poked around and found Album/Sync with Database which did the right
thing. Shouldn't db be transparently synced after mass operations? Otherwise
current behavior is rather confusing and counterintuitive.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20090718/783969b8/attachment.html>

More information about the Digikam-users mailing list