[Digikam-users] digikam's "Settings, Configure, Identity" IPTC fields
Gerhard Kulzer
gerhardkgmx at gmail.com
Tue Jan 22 12:23:56 GMT 2008
Am Monday 21 January 2008 schrieb elle stone:
> Under digikam's "Settings, Configure, Identity" is found "Photographer
> Information": Author, Author Title; "Credit and Copyright": Credit, Source,
> Copyright. I checked around the internet to see what these various fields
> are supposed to mean, be, do . . . and thought I would share. Please
> correct my mistakes, as I don't want to lead anyone astray. And if this is
> the wrong place to share such garnered information, please tell me and I
> apologize in advance!
>
> 1. The "Copyright" field"
> 1a. An example of how to fill in the "Copyright" field is found here:
> http://www.controlledvocabulary.com/imagedatabases/iptc_naa.html
> © Juanita Doe/Parador Times, all rights reserved
>
> 1b. That pesky little copyright symbol. I can't find any way to get the
> copyright symbol into digikam's "Configure -digikam, Identity: Default IPTC
> identity information", Credit and Copyright, Copyright" field. According
> to here: http://www.iusmentis.com/copyright/symbol/ substitutes for the
> symbol, like (c), or abbreviations, are not "legal" substitutes. But you
> don't need the symbol, as the word "copyright" serves just as well.
>
> 1c. "All rights reserved". According to here:
> http://www.iusmentis.com/copyright/allrightsreserved/ this phrase has not
> much legal meaning. However, everyone else, including the "IPTC Core
> Schema for XMP" (see
> www.iptc.org/std/Iptc4xmpCore/1.0/documentation/Iptc4xmpCore_1.0-doc-Cpanel
>sUserGuide_13.pdf) tells you to include the phrase "all rights reserved" if
> you intend to protect your copyright.
>
> 1d. Why bother with the "Copyright" field at all? The short answer is it
> seems to be the way to avoid having one's work "orphaned." See
> http://imagemetadata.com/ for helpful links about the controversy. (One
> also needs to include contact information as part of the image metadata, to
> avoid the "orphan" problem.) And the copyright field also seems to be the
> appropriate place to release a photograph to the creative commons, with a
> specification of the "rights granted", as the copyright laws presume rights
> are reserved unless specifically granted. Or so it seems to me. I am not
> a lawyer.
>
> 2. "Author", "Credit", and "Source" sound an awful lot alike, but they are
> conceptually different, though in fact often the same person/entity.
> Information and quotes in 2a, 2b, 2c below are from:
> http://www.iptc.org/std/Iptc4xmpCore/1.0/documentation/Iptc4xmpCore_1.0-doc
>-CpanelsUserGuide_13.pdf.
>
> 2a. "Creator" and "Author" are "shared fields", meaning whatever is entered
> into the one appears in the other, in the upcoming/developing (Adobe-led)
> XMP standards. Likewise "Author Title" and "Creator's Job Title" are
> shared (these "shared fields" are a "backwards compatibility" thing as XMP
> evolves to include more than IPTC and EXIF). So if you work for an
> organization, your job title goes here. If you work for yourself or take
> pictures as a passion rather than as a profession, I suppose "Photographer"
> or "Starving Artist" might go here.
>
> 2b."Credit" is the same as "Provider". "Use the Provider field to identify
> who is providing the photograph. This doesn’t have to necessarily be the
> owner/ creator. If a photographer is working for a news agency such as
> Reuters or the Associated Press, these organizations could be listed here
> as they are “providing” the image for use by others. If the image is a
> stock photograph, then the group (agency) involved in supplying the image
> should be listed here. Note: This field is “shared” with the “Credit” field
> in the Origin panel of the Adobe Photoshop File Info field."
>
> 2c."Source". "The Source field should be used to identify the original
> owner or copyright holder of the photograph. The value of this field should
> never be changed after the information is entered following the image's
> creation. While not yet enforced by the custom panels, you should consider
> this to be a “write-once” field. The source could be an individual, an
> agency, or a member of an agency. . . . Source may also be different
> from Creator and from the names listed in the Copyright Notice. Note: This
> field is “shared” with the “Source” field in the Origin panel of the Adobe
> Photoshop File Info field."
Thank's very much elle, I updated the documentation. The pop-up helps will
follow :-)
Gerhard
--
><((((º> ¸.·´¯`·... ><((((º> ¸.·´¯`·...¸ ><((((º>
http://www.gerhard.fr
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20080122/06c70d67/attachment.sig>
More information about the Digikam-users
mailing list