[Digikam-users] Some questions about the ImageEditor

[Gerhard Kulzer]

Am Monday 26 November 2007 schrieb Chris G:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 07:34:47AM +0100, Gerhard Kulzer wrote:
> > Am Sunday 25 November 2007 schrieb Chris G:
> > > Aha!  Maybe I have found the (an?) issue here.  My digikam manual says
> > > in Chapter 1  Background:-
> > >
> > >     digiKam incorporates a fast Image Editor with basic image editing
> > >     tools. You can use the Image Editor to view your photographs,
> > >     comment and rate them, make corrections and alterations. The
> > >     editing power can be easily extended by two sets of plugins, the
> > >     Kde Image Plugins Interface (manual) and the DigikamImagePlugins.
> > >     (manual)
> > >
> > > I.e. it has links to separate Kipi and Image plugin documentation.
> > > However the online documentation you have pointed to at
> > > http://www.digikam.org/?q=docs *doesn't'* have the link to Image
> > > plugin documentation, it says:-
> > >
> > >     digiKam incorporates a fast Image Editor with many image editing
> > >     tools. You can use the Image Editor to view your photographs,
> > >     comment and rate them, correct, enhance and alter them. The
> > >     editing power can be easily extended by a set of plugins, the Kde
> > >     Image Plugins Interface (manual)
> > >
> > > So which is right?
> >
> > Depends on your version.
> > With 0.9.1 (I think) we moved the digikamimageplugins into the main
> > application, no separate package and manual anymore, all is in digikam
> > now. You seem to have an old doc intallation. The online doc is the
> > latest version of course. The only optional plugins now are the KIPI
> > plugins.
>
> Well my installation says I have:-
>
>     digikam.x86_64      0.9.2-1.fc7
>     digikam-doc.noarch  0.9.2-0.1.beta2.fc7
>
> So they are both 0.9.2, however I guess the beta documentation might
> not have quite caught up.

From digiKam side is has cought up, but probably not on the packager side. 
Anyway, your questions should be answered now :-)

Gerhard
>
> Thanks for the explanation though, I must admit the Image Editor does
> *feel* as if it's fully integrated into digikam so it does make sense.



-- 
><((((º> ¸.·´¯`·... ><((((º> ¸.·´¯`·...¸ ><((((º>
http://www.gerhard.fr
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20071126/5dddebf7/attachment.sig>