[Digikam-users] tag hierarchy wish 139547

[Daniel Bauer]

On Tuesday 09 January 2007 19:38, Marcel Wiesweg wrote:
> > City
> >     \_Paris [x]
> >          \_Places
> >                 \_NotreDame [x]
> >                 \_EiffelTower
> >                 \_Trocadero [x]
> >     \_London
> >          \_Places
> >                \_PicadilyCircus
> >                \_QueenVictoria
> >                \_R.A.F.Memorial
> >
> > In this case a tagged picture will have following IPTC keywords :
> >
> > City/Paris
> > City/Paris/Places/NotreDame
> > City/Paris/Places/Trocadero
> >
> > In IPTC metadata, we are not limited to add IPTC keywords. The Path
> > stored by digiKam in these tags is the path to the check digiKam Tags in
> > digiKam Tags hierarchy.
>
> If I re-read the mail I misunderstood Daniel,
> that he agrees with storing the complete path "City/Paris/Places/NotreDame"
> instead of just "NotreDame" (and I agree, too!)
> but he wishes that "City/Paris" is not stored as well. Example:
>
> 1)
> City [x]
>     \_Paris [x]
>          \_Places [x]
>
> will be stored as "City", "City/Paris", "City/Paris/Places"
> whereas
>
> 2)
> City [ ]
>     \_Paris [ ]
>          \_Places [x]
>
> is only  "City/Paris/Places".
> So here I meant this behavior is all right but it's a bug if 2) is stored
> like 1)
>
> Marcel

Since Gilles explication of 19:07 I now understand the purpose of the way the 
keywords are stored. So please ignore my mail from 18:53.

Daniel
-- 
Daniel Bauer photographer Basel Switzerland
professional photography: http://www.daniel-bauer.com
Madagascar special: http://www.sanic.ch