[Digikam-users] compilation problems with digikamimageplugins-0.9.1-RC1

[Achim Bohnet]

On Wednesday, 21. February 2007, Dieter Jurzitza wrote:
> Dear Mr. Bohnet,
> tested your suggestion and this variant indeed compiles with gcc 3.3. So, if 
> it is an option please modify
> 
> return(Qsting());
> 
> to
> 
> return Qstring();
> 
> Patch attached.

Thx. Applied.

> Take care, and many thanks for supplying such a great program. I was very 
> happy to notice that digikam-0.9.1 is much more stable with regard to 
> handling non-picture files like the ever-lasting DDISCVRY.DPS on my casio 
> camera that made digikam-0.9.0 crash every other moment it had to cope with 
> it.
> Thank you!
> 
> Take care
> 
> 
> Dieter Jurzitza
> 
> 
> P.S.: and because I use my system 24h a day SuSE 9.3 keeps being a good 
> choice. So, if you need a tester with an old gcc version, let me know.

Good idea.  Feel free to try to build from svn or beta* rc* tarballs
whenever you want and report build problems.

Achim
> 
> Am Mittwoch, 21. Februar 2007 12:02 schrieb Achim Bohnet:
> > As I've no gcc 3.3 at hand.  Can you try in this old gcc version accepts
> >
> > 	return QString();
> ******
> 
> -- 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
>                                |
>                                 \
>                  /\_/\           |
>                 | ~x~ |/-----\   /
>                  \   /-       \_/
>   ^^__   _        /  _  ____   /
>  <°°__ \- \_/     |  |/    |  |
>   ||  ||         _| _|    _| _|
> 
> if you really want to see the pictures above - use some font
> with constant spacing like courier! :-)
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 



-- 
  To me vi is Zen.  To use vi is to practice zen. Every command is
  a koan. Profound to the user, unintelligible to the uninitiated.
  You discover truth everytime you use it.
                                      -- reddy at lion.austin.ibm.com