[Digikam-users] Getting rid of button bars
Jakob Oestergaard
joe at evalesco.com
Mon Apr 9 10:41:06 BST 2007
Dotan Cohen wrote:
> On 08/04/07, Gerhard Kulzer <gerhard at kulzer.net> wrote:
>> The sidebars are considered essential to digiKam. Even if it was possible I
>> would not like to see them hidden. They can be reduced by simple click, and
>> F11 always catapults you into full screen mode.
>>
>> I don't find the UI 'horribly cluttered'.
>>
>> Gerhard
>
> I may have exaggerated. I do find the right (maybe left on non-Hebrew
> systems:Albums, Dates, Tags, Searches) sidebar essential, but the left
> one (Properties, Metadata, Colours, Comments/Tags, Tag Filters) does
> not need to be in the main UI.
I guess that depends on how you work.
For me the Props/Meta/Color/... tabs are absolutely essential, and my
wish for improvement would be the ability to cherry-pick information
from several of the tabs and have it all shown in one; (for example
linear and log histogram and shutter-speed and aperture).
As Gilles wrote, you can make them almost disappear and they will stay
that way, not cluttering up the interface.
Ideally (for us) horizontal screen
> space could be maximized by having the 9 sidebar buttons as a dropdown
> menu in the main toolbar, and a None option. That will net 40
> horizontal pixels width. As all our pictures have white bands above
> and below them in Digikam, it is obvious that the limiting factor in
> their display size is the horizontal width. So anything that we could
> do to increase the horizontal width would be helpful.
While you have a valid point wrt. the horizontal screen space, moving
the tabs to a menu would make them more difficult (slower) to access
(unless hotkeys were provided).
Also please consider portrait images, where we're short on vertical
screen space. Most monitors are 4:3 or even wider; portrait images are
much bigger victims of tool bars and menu bars than landscape images are
of the side tabs.
I'm just trying to say that there's a lot more to this than saving 40
pixels.
--
Best regards,
Jakob Oestergaard
More information about the Digikam-users
mailing list