[Digikam-users] digikam 0.9 @ heise.de
linux at daniel-bauer.com
Sat Dec 23 10:38:21 GMT 2006
On Friday 22 December 2006 22:58, Arnd Baecker wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, Daniel Bauer wrote:
> > On Friday 22 December 2006 18:45, Arnd Baecker wrote:
> > > Dear all,
> > >
> > > also heise-online heard about the recent release of digikam,
> > > http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/82934
> > > """Linux-Bildverwaltung digiKam auf Profikurs"""
> > Obviously heise.de is read by many and from this point for sure it's nice
> > to have a review there.
> Yes, heise by itself has a really good reputation.
> > But the comments are so incredibly stupid [...]
> You did not follow my advice to not read the forum ;-)
You are right :-)
I stopped reading your post where the balefish translation began...
> The forum is known to be just crap (at least most
> of the time ;-), I don't read it).
I didn't know - I was just astonished by the pure amount of foolish comments
from people who for sure never gave digiKam two seconds to look at.
> This is in *strong* contrast to the quality of the journals
> published by heise (e.g. c't or iX), which I personally consider
> to be really good (IMO they are the best in the German
> speaking market).
I wasn't aware of this contrast. Reading the maybe first 30 comments was
enough for me... I felt like getting clobbered over the head with that.
> Anyway, the number of users of digikam will surely enlarge by this
> (I just convinced two more these days ;-),
> and 0.9 is a really *big* milestone!
I fully agree!
And in future I'll read your complete postings, before starting to jangle :-)
> Best, Arnd
Daniel Bauer photographer Basel Switzerland
professional photography: http://www.daniel-bauer.com
Madagascar special: http://www.sanic.ch
More information about the Digikam-users