[Digikam-users] Re: Some thoughts about digiKam

Renchi Raju renchi at pooh.tam.uiuc.edu
Mon Jun 13 20:34:05 BST 2005


i'm forwarding your email to the digikam users mailing list, which is the 
place to have discussions of this sort.

renchi

On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, Heiner Lamprecht wrote:

> Hello Renchi,
>
> I recently tested out digiKam and have some ideas for it. I was
> looking for some program to handle all my digital photographs
> (several thousands as for today, constantly growing ...).
>
> Even if it is a great program, there are some features missing:
>
> I've tested hierarchical categories, but the selection does not
> recognize this.  Let's say, I have two images "img1.jpg" and
> "img2.jpg" and the following structure of categories:
>
>  foo
>  foo/bar_1
>  foo/bar_2
>
> img1.jpg belongs to foo/bar_1, while img2.jpg belongs to foo/bar_2.
> When I select only "foo", no image is displayed at all :-(
>
> Is there a way to search for images?  Like defining some categories,
> dates, ... and see the result?
>
> Have you considered to make use of the IPTC-fields?  As far as I can
> see, one can only assign "categories" in digiKam.  But IPTC offers
> some more fields types, like a title, a genre, a location or
> copyright information.  That would make searching a lot more
> efficient.
>
> What I am looking for is a tool for organizing and archiving all my
> images.  In order to do this, it is essential to have unique names
> for all images and it would be great to let this be handled by an
> application.  In addition, it would be useful to have all images in
> two or three sizes.  My idea is to have an index of _all_ my images
> in some sort of "database" (meaning fully searchable, regardless of
> the actual way the information is stored), that displays thumbnails
> for browsing and maybe a larger preview.  But as the real image is
> too big, it might be on a CD.
>
>
> What do you think about these ideas?
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>    Heiner
>
> BTW:  I have a wheel mouse.  When I use the wheel to scroll the
> thumbnails, it is a lot faster (with less CPU usage), when the
> mouse is over the scrollbar, than over the thumbnail area.
>
> -- 
>    heiner at heiner-lamprecht dot net    GnuPG - Key: 9859E373
>  Fingerprint:  3770 7947 F917 94EF 8717 BADB 0139 7554 9859 E373
>



More information about the Digikam-users mailing list