[Digikam-users] Solution to make problem
Stephan van den Akker
memelink.akker at planet.nl
Sun Jul 3 12:37:56 BST 2005
Hello digikam users,
On Saturday 02 July 2005 16:35, Heiner Lamprecht wrote:
> I just compiled it on my box (SuSE 9.2, running KDE 3.4.1) without
> problems. If you like, I can send you an rpm, but I'm not sure if
> it runs on KDE 3.3.
Thanks for the offer, Heiner. Generally speaking, I think binary rpm's
are a more user-friendly way to distribute Digikam than source tarballs.
SuSE does tend to supply fairly up-to-date RPM's, but they depend
heavily on the accompanying "bleeding edge" KDE-packages. I have had bad
experiences with those, so I don't want to install them on "production"
systems.
I also posted a bug report on bugs.kde.org, and it got several
interesting comments. The problem seems to be confined to KDE 3.3.0.
Have a look at:
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108458
With a little hacking of kdemacros.h as proposed by Vardhman, my make
problem is solved for now. I suspect that it's not an elegant hack, but
it works for me. Maybe the Digikam crew can look into this some more to
avoid the problem in 0.7.4 / 0.8.
On Sunday 03 July 2005 19:01, Gilles Caulier wrote:
> Normally this point have been fixed. Witch tarball have you use to build
> digikam on suse ? From sf.net area ?
The tarball (0.7.3, not a beta version) was downloaded from SF.net.
Greetings,
Stephan van den Akker
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20050703/82caaaff/attachment.html>
More information about the Digikam-users
mailing list