<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">Hello digikam users,<br>
<br>
On Saturday 02 July 2005 16:35, Heiner Lamprecht wrote:<br>
</font>
<pre>> I just compiled it on my box (SuSE 9.2, running KDE 3.4.1) without
> problems. If you like, I can send you an rpm, but I'm not sure if
> it runs on KDE 3.3.</pre>
<font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">Thanks for the offer, Heiner.
Generally speaking, I think binary rpm's are a more user-friendly way
to distribute Digikam than source tarballs. SuSE does tend to supply
fairly up-to-date RPM's, but they depend
heavily on the accompanying "bleeding edge" KDE-packages. I have had
bad experiences with those, so I don't want to install them on
"production"
systems.</font><br>
<font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif"><br>
I also posted a bug report on bugs.kde.org, and it got several
interesting comments. The problem seems to be confined to KDE 3.3.0.
Have a look at:<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108458">http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108458</a><br>
<br>
With a little hacking of kdemacros.h as proposed by Vardhman, my make
problem is solved for now. I suspect that it's not an elegant hack, but
it works for me. Maybe the Digikam crew can look into this some more to
avoid the problem in 0.7.4 / 0.8.<br>
<br>
</font><font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">On Sunday 03 July 2005
19:01, Gilles Caulier wrote:</font><br>
<pre>> Normally this point have been fixed. Witch tarball have you use to build
> digikam on suse ? From sf.net area ?
</pre>
<font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">The tarball (0.7.3, not a
beta version) was downloaded from SF.net.<br>
<br>
Greetings,<br>
<br>
Stephan van den Akker</font><br>
</body>
</html>