Digikam GSoC 2021
Anjani Kumar
anjanik012 at gmail.com
Sat Apr 3 05:37:11 BST 2021
Is there a specific reason to upgrade to mageia 7.1 and not 8? Qt 5.15 is available in the official repos for mageia 8 while for mageia 7.1 it is 5.12 and we would have to build Qt 5.15.
On Apr 2 2021, at 12:42 am, Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Le jeu. 1 avr. 2021 à 20:50, Anjani Kumar <anjanik012 at gmail.com (mailto:anjanik012 at gmail.com)> a écrit :
> > I have a complete list of files that need to be changed in order to compile with Qt6. I used clazy for this. However i need to know if i should summarize the report by organizing them in modules or I should present a complete list for that, because the file list is huge.
> >
> > Also what are your thoughts on using clazy to get the suggested changes and apply them and then build and do regression tests on the code?
>
> I'm not sure if clazy is really the best static analyzer to use at first for this project.
>
> After all the warnings from the compiler using Qt5.15.2 is a good start. Qt includes plenty of deprecated warnings to guide developers in the porting stage.
>
> Clazy must be a good helper later, especially for optimization purposes.
>
> Also the main porting stages must be prior. Classes which are removed in Qt6 need to be treated first, even if a qt5 compatibility helper framework exists in Qt6. Considering that compatibility frameworks do not exist can be a good choice to list which classes and codes need to be ported first.
>
> Best
>
> Gilles Caulier
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-devel/attachments/20210403/91a4ff75/attachment.htm>
More information about the Digikam-devel
mailing list