Database separation for similarity searches
Maik Qualmann
metzpinguin at gmail.com
Mon Jan 22 17:47:11 GMT 2018
Hi Mario,
the 5.9.0 master branch is only for minor bug fixes.
Commit these changes to the 6.0.0 branch.
Maik
Am Montag, 22. Januar 2018, 16:55:25 CET schrieb Mario Frank:
> Hey Gilles,
>
> I looked at the code yesterday and it is not yet finished. I will apply
> some changes to improve performance and report on it before committing.
>
> For which release is the db separation planned? 5.9 or 6.0?
>
> Best
>
> Mario
>
> Am 06.01.2018 um 17:43 schrieb Mario Frank:
> > Hey Gilles,
> >
> > I think she was not completely finished. I will have time for digiKam
> > again after this weekend. I will take a look. I've got unfinished work
> > anyway.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Mario
> >
> > Am 6. Januar 2018 16:16:37 MEZ schrieb Gilles Caulier
> >
> > <caulier.gilles at gmail.com>:
> > Note : with this commit, i sync this branch with master without
> > conflict.
> >
> > https://commits.kde.org/digikam/d8511b14fd3e9c3406357858f557bdefa03d15
> > 51
> >
> > Gilles
> >
> > 2018-01-06 16:13 GMT+01:00 Gilles Caulier
> >
> > <caulier.gilles at gmail.com <mailto:caulier.gilles at gmail.com>>:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This summer, Swaty has work on database separation for
> > similarity searches. The goal was to separate the fuzzy
> > fingerprints storage from core DB to a dedicated DB. This will
> > simplify the backup and prevent to overload the core DB with
> > large data by image (around 500 bytes by fingerprints)
> >
> > The work is not completed as i know. All have be done
> > in origin/gsoc17-db-sep branch from git repository.
> >
> > What's the status of this code exactly ? Can we continue with
> > this implementation, or it will be better to re-start this
> > work from scratch ?
> >
> > The DB separation is important for the future. Thank sin
> > advance for your feedback.
> >
> > Best
> >
> > Gilles
More information about the Digikam-devel
mailing list