Database separation for similarity searches
Mario Frank
mafrank at uni-potsdam.de
Mon Jan 22 15:55:25 GMT 2018
Hey Gilles,
I looked at the code yesterday and it is not yet finished. I will apply
some changes to improve performance and report on it before committing.
For which release is the db separation planned? 5.9 or 6.0?
Best
Mario
Am 06.01.2018 um 17:43 schrieb Mario Frank:
> Hey Gilles,
>
> I think she was not completely finished. I will have time for digiKam
> again after this weekend. I will take a look. I've got unfinished work
> anyway.
>
> Cheers
> Mario
>
> Am 6. Januar 2018 16:16:37 MEZ schrieb Gilles Caulier
> <caulier.gilles at gmail.com>:
>
> Note : with this commit, i sync this branch with master without
> conflict.
>
> https://commits.kde.org/digikam/d8511b14fd3e9c3406357858f557bdefa03d1551
>
> Gilles
>
> 2018-01-06 16:13 GMT+01:00 Gilles Caulier
> <caulier.gilles at gmail.com <mailto:caulier.gilles at gmail.com>>:
>
> Hi all,
>
> This summer, Swaty has work on database separation for
> similarity searches. The goal was to separate the fuzzy
> fingerprints storage from core DB to a dedicated DB. This will
> simplify the backup and prevent to overload the core DB with
> large data by image (around 500 bytes by fingerprints)
>
> The work is not completed as i know. All have be done
> inĀ origin/gsoc17-db-sep branch from git repository.
>
> What's the status of this code exactly ? Can we continue with
> this implementation, or it will be better to re-start this
> work from scratch ?
>
> The DB separation is important for the future. Thank sin
> advance for your feedback.
>
> Best
>
> Gilles
>
>
>
> --
> Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail
> gesendet.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-devel/attachments/20180122/8f8c17c4/attachment.html>
More information about the Digikam-devel
mailing list