[Digikam-devel] (Maybe) incorrect GUI message ("Supplication")

[Gilles Caulier]

2015-03-15 19:13 GMT+01:00 Luigi Toscano <luigi.toscano at tiscali.it>:
> Andrew Goodbody ha scritto:
>> Well 'Supplication' is definitely very wrong. However I do not like
>> 'Sublocation' either; although I could not say that it is wrong, it is quite a
>> long way from the best word to use. Unfortunately I suspect that the best word
>> to use may vary according to local usage. It is not clear to me from that code
>> if it refers to something smaller than a city or larger than a city.
>
> Sorry for the late answer. It seems that the naming is related to the IPTC
> specifications, where "sublocation" is described as:
> "Name of a sublocation the content is focussing on -- either the location
> shown in visual media or referenced by text or audio media. This location name
> could either be the name of a sublocatioto a city or the name of a well known
> location or (natural) monument outside a city. In the sense of a sublocation
> to a city this element is at the fourth level of a top-down geographical
> hierarchy"
>
> So smaller that a city, a specific place.
>
> See: http://www.iptc.org/std/photometadata/specification/IPTC-PhotoMetadata ,
> page 18.
>
> (Luckily it has been replaced by two other keys, "Location Created" and
> "Location Shown").
>
>
>>
>> So 'Sublocation' may be an attempt at compromise but to me it is a compromise
>> that suits no one. I would tentatively suggest 'District' but I may be trying
>> to give a name to something that does not exist in my understanding.
>
> So no District for sure. Given that this is the official name of a tag, I
> would leave Sublocation. If you agree, I can push the change myself: which
> branches?

git master and frameworks branches must be patched...

Gilles Caulier