[Digikam-devel] Question regarding two 8 months old RRs

[Gilles Caulier]

Exactly.

Why to use 2 toos where one is enough. Bugzilla do the stuff to host
patches to review. I don't see advantage to use RB instead Bugzilla
for that.

Also, Bugzilla is the core life of the project. All main idea and
report are done into bugzilla. The Agile project management don by
digiKam team is driven around bugzilla.

In other words, RB break the rules instead to help.

Instead to have a separated tool as RB, i would to see improvement in
bugzilla as well to review patches, for ex to see differences directly
in web interface using color annotations...

 Gilles Caulier

2015-04-05 2:46 GMT+02:00 Teemu Rytilahti <tpr at iki.fi>:
> Marko Käning wrote:
>
>> On 17 Mar 2015, at 19:41 , Veaceslav Munteanu
>> <veaceslav.munteanu90 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> They are already incorporated... long time ago...
>>
>> They should be closed then by the patch committer. :)
>
> We are not using reviewboard that exhaustively, actually preferring not to
> use it. But wanted to just say, that when incorporating patches from there
> anyway, the commiter should add "REVIEW:<number>" to the commit message.
> That way it gets automatically marked as commited.
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Teemu Rytilahti
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-devel mailing list
> Digikam-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel