[Digikam-devel] Soprano / Nepomuk

[Martin Klapetek]

On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:51, Ananta Palani <anantapalani at gmail.com> wrote:

> Good Morning,
>
> I want to slim down the Windows digiKam release and I would like to know
> if Soprano is necessary for its operation? What about Nepomuk? Anything
> else that is unnecessary for digiKam to just operate in its own world?
>

Nepomuk/Soprano is not exactly needed for digiKam to work, it helps system
integration, but it's not needed. I'm also not sure how well (if at all) is
Nepomuk/Soprano supported on Windows, so it might not even make sense to
have Nepomuk integration on Windows.

--
Martin Klapetek | KDE Developer



>
> Thanks,
> -Ananta
>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-devel mailing list
> Digikam-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-devel/attachments/20120113/b988a619/attachment.html>