[Digikam-devel] Re: extragear/graphics/digikam/libs/dimg/filters/fx

[Andi Clemens]

I used CImg because it is nearly 20 times faster.
Why implement such algorithmns on our own if there are ready-to-use, well 
known and tested libraries :-) ?


Andi Clemens
-----------------
www.digikam.org

On Friday 12 November 2010 18:53:57 Marcel Wiesweg wrote:
> > SVN commit 1196146 by cgilles:
> > 
> > Andy, this is not understadable.
> > All CImg::*blur() method crash under MacOsX. and i don't know why...
> > Probably, this is fixed with last CImg 1.4.x release, as digiKam still
> > use 1.3.0... but we cannot update because all Greystoration algorithm
> > have been removed from CImg and migrated to GMic library The solution is
> > to port greystoration code to GMic, as it have been recommended by CImg
> > author in the past by a private mail. But it's a long and complex task.
> > Note : Greystoration tools do not crash under MAC Os X !!! I'm lost...
> > So, I restore old gaussian blur algorithm for Mac only...
> 
> What is the advantage of generally using the CImg variant instead of our
> own code? Do they produce different results?
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-devel mailing list
> Digikam-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel