[Digikam-devel] libface CMake change

[Johannes Wienke]

Aditya Bhatt wrote:
> I'm not entirely sure, is there any new "standard" which says that there's
> no need for a separate lib64? For example, in my Arch system, I'll have to
> tweak stuff with the linker to make it see .so's inside lib64. It *looks*
> like they've deprecated lib64.

For me, if i had a lib64, it was always a symlink to lib.

Johannes

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-devel/attachments/20100628/eea19f3a/attachment.sig>